Re: [RFC] Tux3 for review

[Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:10:52AM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> That makes sense, because the patches to transform our workarounds
> into shiny new kernel hooks are still in progress, as I said. I would
> appreciate the courtesy of being permitted to take the time to do the
> work to the necessary quality without being subjected to endless
> carping about when the patches will be posted.

The feedback which you have been getting, fairly consistently I
believe, is that it is the shiny new kernel hooks that need to be
reviewed, not the workarounds.  I don't think it's a matter of people
not being willing to give you the time to do this work (take all the
time you need!); but rather that it's premature for you to be asking
for tux3 to be merged before those patches have been posted and
reviewed and found to be shiny.

Best regards,

						- Ted