From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33605)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <zhanghy@sangfor.com>) id 1WzKV0-0004AU-Jm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:46:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <zhanghy@sangfor.com>) id 1WzKUu-0002c9-GX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:46:34 -0400
Received: from [58.251.49.30] (port=40422 helo=mail.sangfor.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <zhanghy@sangfor.com>) id 1WzKUu-0002bi-49
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:46:28 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:45:44 +0800
From: "Zhang Haoyu" <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
References: <201406240908546812611@sangfor.com>,
	<20140624054947.GA25614@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <201406241445428077130@sangfor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] Will qemu-2.0.0 be a longterm
	stablebranch?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

>> Hi, all
>> 
>> Which version is best for commercial product, qemu-2.0.0 or other versions?
>> Any advices?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Zhang Haoyu
>
>Use one of the downstreams: Red Hat, Fedora, Debian all ship QEMU and
>have active QEMU maintainers developing the distribution.
>
How to get the latest qemu distribution shipped by RedHat?

Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu
>-- 
>MST