From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3044DE0056A; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:22:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.216.46 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com (mail-qa0-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE186E0043B for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i13so3122961qae.5 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:22:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:organization :user-agent; bh=o5mvXCTISQVCGhtWZeANrw3+Bb35EvIpqDihw5DUjqM=; b=OOEZYC38CfnJCfgRYqWH5s5nbBMOUr5noXoZgBkGH9NpRMhFfYi09GGBvSjc2Fl0L9 1CCpvsD0z0XUI0eGk/kSfLWySAa3I11l/pG/fXkQlZMQUc7jsFoql1AdhzoOrLbpp6/J kzVHzK7K3Gik6OY33ZuFiSA9QKcMVku4oX2WuuTk1pWVEIxkjiVr+D9rdAEIK3OWNfi5 TF8Ea3NaEaLJlgVfoD5PkYcoAi4wvnda+OWCyKWQ3BeqebkOQNmCi1wT3b6ONQC5gxse R0FLgCgqjQjfM31FUjcJJfJldognuGOqJxfumFXC2YVmn8k9e2Ap4JQWkoOpl3RgpwyK vtEw== X-Received: by 10.224.2.196 with SMTP id 4mr16293753qak.60.1403810537923; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bill-the-cat (cpe-098-121-186-226.ec.res.rr.com. [98.121.186.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q10sm12608987qah.9.2014.06.26.12.21.59 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:22:01 -0400 From: Tom Rini To: Denys Dmytriyenko Message-ID: <20140626192201.GP9006@bill-the-cat> References: <1403712632-26072-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org> <20140626133045.GN9006@bill-the-cat> <20140626173148.GB6700@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140626173148.GB6700@edge> Organization: Texas Instruments User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot: disable SPL/MLO processing for omapl138 SOCs X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:22:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:31:48PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:30:45AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:10:32PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > > From: Denys Dmytriyenko > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko > > > --- > > > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb > > > index b326aa1..9da6f7d 100644 > > > --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb > > > +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb > > > @@ -25,3 +25,6 @@ SRCREV = "76b21026ceb5a6a83fc53b0ecdf425f240318022" > > > > > > SPL_BINARY = "MLO" > > > SPL_UART_BINARY = "u-boot-spl.bin" > > > + > > > +SPL_BINARY_omapl138 = "" > > > +SPL_UART_BINARY_omapl138 = "" > > > > omapl138 is am18xx right? SPL supports that. The only issue is that we > > need to ship u-boot.ais which is a combo image. If I'm looking at the > > right branch, the problem(s) right now are we don't use the right config > > target (da850_am18xxevm_config is what we want) and UBOOT_SUFFIX to > > "ais" (in the omapl138.inc file). > > What's the difference between da850_config and da850_am18xxevm_config? The > first one is what we used previously. Is the second one set ups the building > of "ais" image? The difference between a "da850 evm" and "am18xx evm" is where the MAC is stored, da850_am18xxevm picks it up from the right place. > As of UBOOT_SUFFIX, with hierarchical inclusion of different .inc files, it > would be overwritten if defined in the machine config. Usually we end up > specifying it in the machine-specific u-boot recipe. Let me take a look at it > and see if we can move that var to the machine config... Right, I'm referring to the machine.inc file here since it's a SoC-level thing rather than a machine-tweakable thing. -- Tom