From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net (vms173019pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.19]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5974560CFC for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.191.205.189]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N7S00JC8VJNIRQ0@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:50:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1D5032018D; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:50:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:50:10 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20140626235010.GI1580@denix.org> References: <53AA0672.7070606@balister.org> <2894594.Bns9GHPWX5@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <53AB1718.7000608@balister.org> <20140625185504.GD1580@denix.org> <53AB5ADB.3080403@balister.org> <20140626180954.GG1580@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: State of the art for creating an image that you can dd to an SD card X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:50:18 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:23:35PM -0700, Ash Charles wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > "CHS business", as Philip called it, was only partially required in the early > > days of OMAP3 SoCs few years ago, due to some "specific" FAT implementation of > > the BootROM. These days it's not required on modern Sitara SoCs. > Which OMAP3 SOCs need the CHS business? Definitely OMAP34xx/35xx family. I'm not very sure if OMAP36xx/37xx had a fixed BootROM already, but probably it had, as Beagleboard xM was much more forgiving to SD card format, IIRC... -- Denys