From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [rcu] 2d033d5c0d4: +225.2% iperf.tcp.sender.bps
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:47:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140629224700.GT4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140629151544.GA11875@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6175 bytes --]
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:15:44PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/next
> commit 2d033d5c0d424b7029abd0fc82e940ebc318fd89 ("rcu: Bind grace-period kthreads to non-NO_HZ_FULL CPUs")
Nice! Clearly outlines the hazards of providing too few housekeeping CPUs,
I would guess.
Thanx, Paul
> test case: bens/iperf/300s-tcp
>
> e17adc3f20bc9a1 2d033d5c0d424b7029abd0fc8
> --------------- -------------------------
> 7.011e+09 ~ 1% +225.2% 2.28e+10 ~ 2% TOTAL iperf.tcp.sender.bps
> 7.011e+09 ~ 1% +225.2% 2.28e+10 ~ 2% TOTAL iperf.tcp.receiver.bps
> 15620691 ~ 1% +224.3% 50663012 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
> 62969722 ~ 1% +224.3% 2.042e+08 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgfree
> 47347349 ~ 1% +224.3% 1.535e+08 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma32
> 4996590 ~ 1% +218.9% 15933563 ~ 3% TOTAL softirqs.NET_RX
> 8084072 ~ 1% +218.4% 25739055 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_hit
> 8084072 ~ 1% +218.4% 25739055 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_local
> 28676 ~ 2% -47.5% 15059 ~11% TOTAL softirqs.RCU
> 99756 ~ 2% +76.0% 175606 ~ 2% TOTAL softirqs.SCHED
> 562 ~11% +50.9% 848 ~17% TOTAL slabinfo.proc_inode_cache.active_objs
> 620 ~ 8% +38.7% 860 ~15% TOTAL slabinfo.proc_inode_cache.num_objs
> 271905 ~ 4% +17.4% 319216 ~ 0% TOTAL softirqs.TIMER
> 1117 ~ 1% -9.1% 1015 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgactivate
> 9049 ~11% -94.6% 485 ~26% TOTAL time.involuntary_context_switches
> 23233 ~ 1% +72.1% 39979 ~ 2% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
> 13078 ~ 1% +69.1% 22117 ~ 1% TOTAL vmstat.system.in
>
> Legend:
> ~XX% - stddev percent
> [+-]XX% - change percent
>
>
> iperf.tcp.sender.bps
>
> 2.4e+10 ++----O-----O-----------O--------------O-----O--------O-----O-----+
> | O O O O O O O O |
> 2.2e+10 O+ O O O |
> 2e+10 ++ O |
> | |
> 1.8e+10 ++ |
> 1.6e+10 ++ O O |
> | |
> 1.4e+10 ++ |
> 1.2e+10 ++ |
> | |
> 1e+10 ++ |
> 8e+09 ++ |
> *..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*
> 6e+09 ++----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> iperf.tcp.receiver.bps
>
> 2.4e+10 ++----O-----O-----------O--------------O-----O--------O-----O-----+
> | O O O O O O O O |
> 2.2e+10 O+ O O O |
> 2e+10 ++ O |
> | |
> 1.8e+10 ++ |
> 1.6e+10 ++ O O |
> | |
> 1.4e+10 ++ |
> 1.2e+10 ++ |
> | |
> 1e+10 ++ |
> 8e+09 ++ |
> *..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*
> 6e+09 ++----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> time.involuntary_context_switches
>
> 14000 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | |
> 12000 *+. .*.. ..*..*.. .*.. |
> | .*..*. *. *. |
> 10000 ++ *. *..*.. .*..*..*.. ..*..*.. *
> | *. *. .*.. ..|
> 8000 ++ *. * |
> | |
> 6000 ++ |
> | |
> 4000 ++ |
> | |
> 2000 ++ |
> | O O O O |
> 0 O+-O--O--O--O--O---O--O--O--O--O--O--O--O-----O------O--O-----O-----+
>
>
> [*] bisect-good sample
> [O] bisect-bad sample
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
> ./iperf3 -s
> ./iperf3 -t 300 -f M -J -c 127.0.0.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [rcu] 2d033d5c0d4: +225.2% iperf.tcp.sender.bps
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:47:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140629224700.GT4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140629151544.GA11875@localhost>
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:15:44PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/next
> commit 2d033d5c0d424b7029abd0fc82e940ebc318fd89 ("rcu: Bind grace-period kthreads to non-NO_HZ_FULL CPUs")
Nice! Clearly outlines the hazards of providing too few housekeeping CPUs,
I would guess.
Thanx, Paul
> test case: bens/iperf/300s-tcp
>
> e17adc3f20bc9a1 2d033d5c0d424b7029abd0fc8
> --------------- -------------------------
> 7.011e+09 ~ 1% +225.2% 2.28e+10 ~ 2% TOTAL iperf.tcp.sender.bps
> 7.011e+09 ~ 1% +225.2% 2.28e+10 ~ 2% TOTAL iperf.tcp.receiver.bps
> 15620691 ~ 1% +224.3% 50663012 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
> 62969722 ~ 1% +224.3% 2.042e+08 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgfree
> 47347349 ~ 1% +224.3% 1.535e+08 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma32
> 4996590 ~ 1% +218.9% 15933563 ~ 3% TOTAL softirqs.NET_RX
> 8084072 ~ 1% +218.4% 25739055 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_hit
> 8084072 ~ 1% +218.4% 25739055 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.numa_local
> 28676 ~ 2% -47.5% 15059 ~11% TOTAL softirqs.RCU
> 99756 ~ 2% +76.0% 175606 ~ 2% TOTAL softirqs.SCHED
> 562 ~11% +50.9% 848 ~17% TOTAL slabinfo.proc_inode_cache.active_objs
> 620 ~ 8% +38.7% 860 ~15% TOTAL slabinfo.proc_inode_cache.num_objs
> 271905 ~ 4% +17.4% 319216 ~ 0% TOTAL softirqs.TIMER
> 1117 ~ 1% -9.1% 1015 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgactivate
> 9049 ~11% -94.6% 485 ~26% TOTAL time.involuntary_context_switches
> 23233 ~ 1% +72.1% 39979 ~ 2% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
> 13078 ~ 1% +69.1% 22117 ~ 1% TOTAL vmstat.system.in
>
> Legend:
> ~XX% - stddev percent
> [+-]XX% - change percent
>
>
> iperf.tcp.sender.bps
>
> 2.4e+10 ++----O-----O-----------O--------------O-----O--------O-----O-----+
> | O O O O O O O O |
> 2.2e+10 O+ O O O |
> 2e+10 ++ O |
> | |
> 1.8e+10 ++ |
> 1.6e+10 ++ O O |
> | |
> 1.4e+10 ++ |
> 1.2e+10 ++ |
> | |
> 1e+10 ++ |
> 8e+09 ++ |
> *..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*
> 6e+09 ++----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> iperf.tcp.receiver.bps
>
> 2.4e+10 ++----O-----O-----------O--------------O-----O--------O-----O-----+
> | O O O O O O O O |
> 2.2e+10 O+ O O O |
> 2e+10 ++ O |
> | |
> 1.8e+10 ++ |
> 1.6e+10 ++ O O |
> | |
> 1.4e+10 ++ |
> 1.2e+10 ++ |
> | |
> 1e+10 ++ |
> 8e+09 ++ |
> *..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*
> 6e+09 ++----------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> time.involuntary_context_switches
>
> 14000 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | |
> 12000 *+. .*.. ..*..*.. .*.. |
> | .*..*. *. *. |
> 10000 ++ *. *..*.. .*..*..*.. ..*..*.. *
> | *. *. .*.. ..|
> 8000 ++ *. * |
> | |
> 6000 ++ |
> | |
> 4000 ++ |
> | |
> 2000 ++ |
> | O O O O |
> 0 O+-O--O--O--O--O---O--O--O--O--O--O--O--O-----O------O--O-----O-----+
>
>
> [*] bisect-good sample
> [O] bisect-bad sample
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
> ./iperf3 -s
> ./iperf3 -t 300 -f M -J -c 127.0.0.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-29 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-29 15:15 [rcu] 2d033d5c0d4: +225.2% iperf.tcp.sender.bps Fengguang Wu
2014-06-29 15:15 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-06-29 22:47 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-06-29 22:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140629224700.GT4603@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.