From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:22:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20140630142224.GA30417@ulmo> References: <1404163947-3105-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <6153646.CZ57BgYKf3@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:36793 "EHLO mail-wi0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752007AbaF3OW2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:22:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id cc10so6118336wib.0 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6153646.CZ57BgYKf3@wuerfel> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > > it will be done with using device tree. > >=20 >=20 > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that there are no longer any users. How was this determined? Thierry --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTsXKgAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhZTgQALm6kMsbUMEvoihoMKT0ffbS wsqYhbSXTh98pnW4/ggCEMbgGXwzb7HOlp1O/uRpMSAGK58gp/1hiGKvcQn0zxSY EhCq8+9y9saf612E0D2C/LXdBMun9GZolhodflnAEnLOzhAtShVtpHTWNSeuYYcf tRhxMfyZe7HDZ1y8IfSLOd6X+7+pPBPm41lL2m9JYYKqRGZjW/bjl81FQAkjpB0I AHdhrBMx98dDUcc6Q1sF8ZYqxmRLtMG/qnRoGOpc+zmAmklVz3fHkIpDBjFooC20 gVCM9EyA4mRmyUDigude4vsWxkmHMQ3YklHlunxTix9GsP/ZMOdirA0EV4TSez6V 6GyGJnMMOK/k33C8N0O13TqtPBNYdcOxQn/dV+63ZC7vY1fM5zrnbfZma7ZTD5af 9uBjigaUQl4rsSQJxhqO09O8a24NcY0NVdT2vjnOtT1/gMGl3wtTKE/csnPRjzZi pdM+kiwSo4JWF/ZZ94Bgs1/88qkPmxkPIaReD7yarTmsIx1ZqTZGUC8zZ33Mx0HL Q9dUJX3lzWQNHBQYblWukkteO80lKq48y9/c5TKR77thdCzxZDUCWwa8WRaioRBV /yIngxaj9Fv1IhAFboDH07g42/2RkNPZGUSdw3Y9IXyFyOdIng9R4++WSjTcYR5u Q74pYaQa2NMTAyr/oiKa =lSXA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:22:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline In-Reply-To: <6153646.CZ57BgYKf3@wuerfel> References: <1404163947-3105-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <6153646.CZ57BgYKf3@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20140630142224.GA30417@ulmo> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > > it will be done with using device tree. > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that there are no longer any users. How was this determined? Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: