From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X22CU-0001RO-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:50:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X22CT-00075t-PE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:50:38 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([2002:c35c:fd02::1]:41370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X22CT-00075i-Fj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:50:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 18:50:36 +0100 From: Al Viro Message-ID: <20140701175036.GJ18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <53A9C47C.2050002@twiddle.net> <20140624203244.GZ18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <53A9E650.2020709@twiddle.net> <20140624212450.GB18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <53A9EE7E.4020802@twiddle.net> <20140625070117.GD18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20140626055541.GF18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <53B1AEEF.8010108@twiddle.net> <20140630205635.GG18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <53B2E9CA.4040802@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53B2E9CA.4040802@twiddle.net> Sender: Al Viro Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] alpha qemu arithmetic exceptions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:03:06AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 06/30/2014 01:56 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:43AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > >> Looks good. > >> > >> I've split it up into a couple of smaller patches, made some sylistic tweaks > >> and pushed it to > >> > >> git://github.com/rth7680/qemu.git axp-next > >> > >> I'm starting to do some testing now, but a glance though would be helpful. > >> Especially to see if I didn't make some silly mistake in the process. > > Hmm. I've just gotten through glibc testing and there are quite a few failures > of the form > > Failure: nearbyint (4.5): Exception "Inexact" set > > in math/test-double.out. > > Any chance you can run the glibc math tests against real hardware and see if > these pass? I have a feeling that qemu is now signaling inexact when the > hardware doesn't for "/SU" (but not /SUI) instructions. Which glibc version? Better yet, could you throw preprocessed source my way? UP1000 box is not in a good shape and I'd rather avoid trying to run full glibc builds on it ;-/