From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@gmail.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] e1000: clean up phyreg_writeops/set_phy_ctrl
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 12:19:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140702091933.GA3461@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140702091230.GA3296@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:12:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:03:48PM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > Make phyreg_writeops responsible for actually writing their
> > respective phy registers. The only current instance of
> > phyreg_writeops is set_phy_ctrl(), which we modify to actually
> > write the register, while also correctly handling reserved and
> > self-clearing bits.
> >
> > have_autoneg() does not need to check for MII_CR_RESTART_AUTO_NEG,
> > since the only time the flag comes into play is during set_phy_ctrl(),
> > and never actually gets written to the phy control register. We also
> > move it in front of set_phy_ctrl(), to avoid a forward declaration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu>
> > ---
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> Applied, thanks!
And just to clarify (I'd like to add this to the commit log)
we are fixing a minor bug here: MII_CR_RESTART_AUTO_NEG and MII_CR_RESET
aren't self-clearing as they should be, and low 5 bits aren't RO
as they should be.
> > Michael, Stefan:
> >
> > Here's a new version of this patch with slightly better (IMHO) formatting.
> > I think the merits are 1. handling bits which are reserved or self
> > clearing; and 2. eliminating the surprise of a "write op" that does not
> > actually write to its register :)
> >
> > Regarding the "sibling" patch originally accompanying this one (which
> > increased the timer delay for autonegotiation), I'll take a while
> > longer to figure out what's really going on, so I'll send out a separate
> > patch if/when that happens.
> >
> > Please apply (or review/critique) this one independently.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gabriel
> >
> > hw/net/e1000.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/net/e1000.c b/hw/net/e1000.c
> > index 0fc29a0..04c0f91 100644
> > --- a/hw/net/e1000.c
> > +++ b/hw/net/e1000.c
> > @@ -186,21 +186,31 @@ e1000_link_up(E1000State *s)
> > s->phy_reg[PHY_STATUS] |= MII_SR_LINK_STATUS;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool
> > +have_autoneg(E1000State *s)
> > +{
> > + return (s->compat_flags & E1000_FLAG_AUTONEG) &&
> > + (s->phy_reg[PHY_CTRL] & MII_CR_AUTO_NEG_EN);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void
> > set_phy_ctrl(E1000State *s, int index, uint16_t val)
> > {
> > + /* bits 0-5 reserved; MII_CR_[RESTART_AUTO_NEG,RESET] are self clearing */
> > + s->phy_reg[PHY_CTRL] = val & ~(0x3f |
> > + MII_CR_RESET |
> > + MII_CR_RESTART_AUTO_NEG);
> > +
> > /*
> > * QEMU 1.3 does not support link auto-negotiation emulation, so if we
> > * migrate during auto negotiation, after migration the link will be
> > * down.
> > */
> > - if (!(s->compat_flags & E1000_FLAG_AUTONEG)) {
> > - return;
> > - }
> > - if ((val & MII_CR_AUTO_NEG_EN) && (val & MII_CR_RESTART_AUTO_NEG)) {
> > + if (have_autoneg(s) && (val & MII_CR_RESTART_AUTO_NEG)) {
> > e1000_link_down(s);
> > DBGOUT(PHY, "Start link auto negotiation\n");
> > - timer_mod(s->autoneg_timer, qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) + 500);
> > + timer_mod(s->autoneg_timer,
> > + qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) + 500);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -446,8 +456,9 @@ set_mdic(E1000State *s, int index, uint32_t val)
> > } else {
> > if (addr < NPHYWRITEOPS && phyreg_writeops[addr]) {
> > phyreg_writeops[addr](s, index, data);
> > + } else {
> > + s->phy_reg[addr] = data;
> > }
> > - s->phy_reg[addr] = data;
> > }
> > }
> > s->mac_reg[MDIC] = val | E1000_MDIC_READY;
> > @@ -848,14 +859,6 @@ receive_filter(E1000State *s, const uint8_t *buf, int size)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static bool
> > -have_autoneg(E1000State *s)
> > -{
> > - return (s->compat_flags & E1000_FLAG_AUTONEG) &&
> > - (s->phy_reg[PHY_CTRL] & MII_CR_AUTO_NEG_EN) &&
> > - (s->phy_reg[PHY_CTRL] & MII_CR_RESTART_AUTO_NEG);
> > -}
> > -
> > static void
> > e1000_set_link_status(NetClientState *nc)
> > {
> > --
> > 1.9.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-01 19:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] e1000: clean up phyreg_writeops/set_phy_ctrl Gabriel L. Somlo
2014-07-02 9:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-07-02 9:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140702091933.GA3461@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=gsomlo@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.