From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:31:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: kirkwood: add appended DTB support in kirkwood_defconfig In-Reply-To: <20140702142510.GM23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1404305778-17757-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20140702134655.GE20799@lunn.ch> <20140702142510.GM23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20140702143157.GH20799@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:25:10AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 03:46:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:56:17PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Most of the Kirkwood platforms use fairly old bootloaders that don't > > > have Device Tree support, so it makes sense to enable appended DTB > > > support by default, as well as the backward compatibility with ATAGS > > > passed by the bootloader for those platforms. It helps having a > > > defconfig that works fine out of the box for most Kirkwood platforms. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > > > --- > > > arch/arm/configs/kirkwood_defconfig | 2 ++ > > > > Hi Thomas > > > > I plan to remove mach-kirkwood this cycle. So kirkwood_defconfig will > > get removed. Please could you patch mvebu_v5_defconfig instead? > > Do we need to? There may be users who want to build a non-multiplatform > kernel for kirkwood, or dove... It certainly takes less time than a > multiplatform build. Hi Jason mvebu_v5_defconfig is a single platform build, since kirkwood is the only mvebu v5 device. In future orion5x could be added, but i don't expect a huge build time difference. Andrew