From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:35:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.3: add patch for PR60155 In-Reply-To: <53B415CE.5090109@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1404308617-5370-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20140702161826.76ea2d0c@free-electrons.com> <53B415CE.5090109@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20140702163522.3c0f7794@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Gustavo Zacarias, On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:23:10 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > Yes, gcc 4.9.0 doesn't need it. Cool. > IMHO it should have been in 4.8.3 since the bug was resolved in April 4 > and gcc was released on May 22, but i don't know their release policies > so who knows. OK. > Regarding CT-NG that's up to Yann, and yes an exception is in order, > though if you look at other failures it does affect internal toolchains > as well so the fix alone will make errors go down albeit not all of them. Yes, sure. I'll work on the autobuilder exception. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com