From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@kernel.org, Waiman.Long@hp.com, davidlohr@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, aswin@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com,
chegu_vinod@hp.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Cancellable MCS spinlock rework
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 09:31:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140703073107.GS19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404322203.3170.17.camel@j-VirtualBox>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 347 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:30:03AM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> Would potentially reducing the size of the rw semaphore structure by 32
> bits (for all architectures using optimistic spinning) be a nice
> benefit?
Possibly, although I had a look at the mutex structure and we didn't
have a hole to place it in, unlike what you found with the rwsem.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-03 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 16:21 [RFC] Cancellable MCS spinlock rework Jason Low
2014-07-02 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-02 16:59 ` Jason Low
2014-07-02 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-02 17:30 ` Jason Low
2014-07-03 4:39 ` Jason Low
2014-07-03 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-03 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-07-03 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-07-03 18:22 ` Jason Low
2014-07-03 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-03 17:09 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-03 18:34 ` Jason Low
2014-07-03 20:35 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-03 20:51 ` Jason Low
2014-07-03 21:35 ` Waiman Long
2014-07-03 21:54 ` Jason Low
2014-07-04 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-04 1:07 ` Jason Low
2014-07-04 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 17:22 ` Jason Low
2014-07-04 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140703073107.GS19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.