All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
To: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] rebase no longer omits local commits
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 20:09:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140703190917.GE13153@serenity.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B57352.50202@tedfelix.com>

On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:14:26AM -0400, Ted Felix wrote:
> Starting with git 1.9.0, rebase no longer omits local commits that 
> appear in both the upstream and local branches.
> 
> I've bisected this down to commit bb3f458: "rebase: fix fork-point with 
> zero arguments".  The attached script reproduces the problem.  Reverting 
> the aforementioned commit fixes the problem.
> 
> A failed run of this script will result in conflicts.  A successful run 
> against master with bb3f458 reverted ends as follows:
> 
>  From /tmp/rebase-issue/maint
>     fe401cd..955af04  master     -> origin/master
> fatal: Not a valid object name: ''
> First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
> Applying: Third change
> 
> (I'm not sure if that "fatal: Not a valid object name: ''" is of any 
> concern.  It started appearing for me at some point during the bisect.)

It is the problem that bb3f458 fixes.  The change in behaviour is
actually introduced by ad8261d (rebase: use reflog to find common base
with upstream).

In your example, I think this is working as designed.  You can restore
the previous behaviour either with `git rebase --no-fork-point` or with
`git rebase @{u}`.

The change is designed to help users recover from an upstream rebase, as
described in the "DISCUSSION ON FORK-POINT MODE" section of
git-merge-base(1) and makes `git rebase` match the behaviour of
`git pull --rebase` so that:

	git fetch &&
	git rebase

really is equivalent to:

	git pull --rebase

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-03 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-03 15:14 [BUG] rebase no longer omits local commits Ted Felix
2014-07-03 19:09 ` John Keeping [this message]
2014-07-03 22:25   ` John Keeping
2014-07-07 17:56     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-07 21:14       ` John Keeping
2014-07-15 19:14         ` [PATCH 1/2] rebase--am: use --cherry-pick instead of --ignore-if-in-upstream John Keeping
2014-07-15 19:14           ` [PATCH 2/2] rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-point John Keeping
2014-07-15 19:48             ` Ted Felix
2014-07-15 22:06             ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-16 19:23               ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rebase--am: use --cherry-pick instead of --ignore-if-in-upstream John Keeping
2014-07-16 19:23                 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-point John Keeping
2014-07-16 20:26                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-16 21:27                     ` John Keeping
2014-07-16 21:36                   ` Ted Felix
2014-07-17  9:36                     ` John Keeping

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140703190917.GE13153@serenity.lan \
    --to=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ted@tedfelix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.