All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DNAME_INLINE_LEN versus CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:32:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140704013222.GH9508@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fviite1u.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> writes:
> 
> > In dcache.h, DNAME_INLINE_LEN is carefully chosen so that sizeof(struct
> > dentry) is a (specific) multiple of 64 bytes. Obviously this breaks when
> > certain debug options are chosen (DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC and DEBUG_SPINLOCK),
> > but also, AFAICT, on architectures with CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK.
> >
> > I'm not sure it matters, but if it does, I'd suggest putting a
> > BUILD_BUG_ON somewhere, protected by suitable #ifdefs, so that the code
> > documents the assumptions that went into the particular choice of
> > DNAME_INLINE_LEN (this would also help catch changes to some of the
> > structures embedded in struct dentry which would violate those
> > assumptions). 
> 
> The right fix would be to pad it correctly for these other variants
> too.

IF you've turned on debugging options, then you've already lost more
performance that careful packing of the dentry slab cache gains you.
There's no point in carefully tuning DNAME_INLINE_LEN for debug
options - it's just code that will break and annoy people as debug
implementations change.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-04  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-03  9:18 DNAME_INLINE_LEN versus CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK Rasmus Villemoes
2014-07-03 19:53 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-04  1:32   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-07-04  3:16     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140704013222.GH9508@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.