From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] cpufreq: add driver for Armada XP Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:25:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20140704132528.GD7773@lunn.ch> References: <1404467103-29644-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1404467103-29644-3-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20140704131247.2c8ecde2@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:42228 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752613AbaGDNaG (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 09:30:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140704131247.2c8ecde2@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Viresh Kumar , Mike Turquette , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Gregory Clement , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Tawfik Bayouk , Nadav Haklai , Lior Amsalem , Ezequiel Garcia > This doesn't work very well with the idea of having the OPP table > statically encoded in to the Device Tree. Options are: > > - Improve the cpufreq-cpu0 driver so that the OPP table can be passed > through platform_data, and therefore built dynamically by the > platform code and passed when registering the cpufreq > platform_device. > > - Dynamically build/update the OPP table in the Device Tree. > > Which option do you think is appropriate here? It should also be noted that that applies to many Marvell SoCs. Kirkwood and Dove are the same. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:25:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/8] cpufreq: add driver for Armada XP In-Reply-To: <20140704131247.2c8ecde2@free-electrons.com> References: <1404467103-29644-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1404467103-29644-3-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20140704131247.2c8ecde2@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20140704132528.GD7773@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > This doesn't work very well with the idea of having the OPP table > statically encoded in to the Device Tree. Options are: > > - Improve the cpufreq-cpu0 driver so that the OPP table can be passed > through platform_data, and therefore built dynamically by the > platform code and passed when registering the cpufreq > platform_device. > > - Dynamically build/update the OPP table in the Device Tree. > > Which option do you think is appropriate here? It should also be noted that that applies to many Marvell SoCs. Kirkwood and Dove are the same. Andrew