From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2620DE00746; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [212.27.42.5 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8D0E006D5 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 07:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (unknown [88.170.243.169]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE082D480D0; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:18:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:18:20 +0200 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Fabio Estevam Message-ID: <20140707161820.2da0b3b5@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: References: <1404739331-8135-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1404739331-8135-4-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/4] linux-fslc (3.14): Update to 4202f3c revision X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:18:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Fabio, Le Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:05:31 -0300, Fabio Estevam a =E9crit : >=20 > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > > This updates the 3.14-based kernel to the 3.14.9 release. >=20 > Why not 3.14.11 instead? >=20 >=20 > And what about upgrading master to 3.15.4? 3.14.x would be interesting to keep as it's a long term version (up to August 2016). Best regards, Eric