From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Run the perf test suite for profile feedback too Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:15:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20140707221507.GV19781@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1404517432-25185-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1404517432-25185-4-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 08 00:15:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X4HBt-00087z-0N for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:15:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751345AbaGGWPL (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 18:15:11 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:18449 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751205AbaGGWPK (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 18:15:10 -0400 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2014 15:15:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,621,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="558531310" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.157]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2014 15:15:08 -0700 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 85DA0302332; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:06:57PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andi Kleen writes: > > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > Open: If the perf test suite is representative enough it may > > be reasonable to only run that and skip the much longer full > > test suite. Thoughts? > > I do not think it right now is representative, nor it was meant to > become so. The operations are those that people cared about and > tuned, and hopefully it would cover stuff actual end users care > about in the real life, though. I ended up answering the question by creating two separate makefile targets in the next patch. profile to run the full test suite and profile-fast to run only the performance test. profile-fast as the name implies is a lot faster to build, and fast enough that it's not annoying. I'll remove the "Open" -Andi