From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: samsung updates from arm testing Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 14:35:14 +0200 Message-ID: <201407121435.14947.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1405086308-1461192-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1405086308-1461192-2-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20140711135400.GY30458@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68758265086 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 14:35:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20140711135400.GY30458@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: t.figa@samsung.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Friday 11 July 2014, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:45:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Here are a few patches from my randconfig and multiplatform series. > > The smartq patch is a re-send of the one I screwed up the other day. > > the dependencies and dma data removal should be trivial, the > > dmaengine one probably needs some closer inspection. > > Hrm, can you check what's going on with the series - I've got two copies > of patch 2 and an extra patch [PATCH] ASoC: s3c64xx/smartq: use dynamic > registration which is threaded before this cover letter and looks like a > resend of the prior copy with the platform_data header missing that got > included by mistake? The patches look OK but I just want to make sure > I'm applying the right things. It seems I accidentally left the old version of the patch in the directory I used for sending the patches, so git-send-email was sending both the old and the new version. Please just disregard the patch named "[PATCH] ASoC: s3c64xx/smartq: use dynamic registration", the other ones are those I wanted to send. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 14:35:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: samsung updates from arm testing In-Reply-To: <20140711135400.GY30458@sirena.org.uk> References: <1405086308-1461192-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1405086308-1461192-2-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20140711135400.GY30458@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <201407121435.14947.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 11 July 2014, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:45:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Here are a few patches from my randconfig and multiplatform series. > > The smartq patch is a re-send of the one I screwed up the other day. > > the dependencies and dma data removal should be trivial, the > > dmaengine one probably needs some closer inspection. > > Hrm, can you check what's going on with the series - I've got two copies > of patch 2 and an extra patch [PATCH] ASoC: s3c64xx/smartq: use dynamic > registration which is threaded before this cover letter and looks like a > resend of the prior copy with the platform_data header missing that got > included by mistake? The patches look OK but I just want to make sure > I'm applying the right things. It seems I accidentally left the old version of the patch in the directory I used for sending the patches, so git-send-email was sending both the old and the new version. Please just disregard the patch named "[PATCH] ASoC: s3c64xx/smartq: use dynamic registration", the other ones are those I wanted to send. Arnd