From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: dm-multipath: Accept failed paths for multipath maps Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:38:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20140718143855.GA4762@redhat.com> References: <1387353155-7271-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20131218140858.GC17730@redhat.com> <52B1B046.3040301@suse.de> <1387380498.7608.6.camel@ict-vth-stewarts01.ict.englab.netapp.com> <20140718000411.GB337@redhat.com> <8A51900D08212F40B3DE22453052F69839C46AF4@wdscexmb02> <20140718021806.GA1143@redhat.com> <8A51900D08212F40B3DE22453052F69839C46B5B@wdscexmb02> <53C8B757.2000904@suse.de> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53C8B757.2000904@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, John Utz List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Fri, Jul 18 2014 at 1:57am -0400, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 07/18/2014 05:31 AM, John Utz wrote: > >Thankyou very much for the exhaustive answer! I forwarded on to my > > project peers because i don't think any of us where aware of the > > existing infrastructure. > > > >Of course, said infrastructure would have to be taught about ZAC, > > but it seems like it would be a nice place to start testing from.... > > > ZAC is a different beast altogether; I've posted an initial set of > patches a while back on linux-scsi. > But I don't think multipath needs to be changed for that. > Other areas of device-mapper most certainly do. Pretty sure John is working on a new ZAC-oriented DM target.