From: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: assert in xfs_log_commit_cil
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 23:02:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140719210245.GL17283@slnx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140124222017.GB26397@dastard>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3763 bytes --]
On Sat, Jan 25, 09:20, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I hit this assertion on one of my test boxes today:
> >
> > [1167966.151275] XFS: Assertion failed: !list_empty(&cil->xc_cil), file: /root/xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c, line: 636
>
> I suppose that can happen if we are committing a transaction that
> has no dirty objects in it. But that can't happen from
> xfs_setfilesize(). That implies memory corruption or that someone has
> busted rwsem behaviour.
>
> > [1167966.162659] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [1167966.168021] kernel BUG at /root/xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:107!
> > [1167966.168026] invalid opcode: 0000 [#4] SMP
> > [1167966.168081] Modules linked in: xfs(OF) ext2(F) dm_flakey(F) crc32c(F) libcrc32c(F) autofs4(F) cpufreq_conservative(F) cpufreq_userspace(F) cpufreq_powersave(F) microcode(F) fuse(F) loop(F) dm_mod(F) joydev(F) hid_generic(F) usbhid(F) hid(F) ehci_pci(F) ehci_hcd(F) iTCO_wdt(F) iTCO_vendor_support(F) ipv6(F) usbcore(F) sg(F) igb(F) isci(F) sr_mod(F) pcspkr(F) mptctl(F) cdrom(F) libsas(F) usb_common(F) ioatdma(F) ptp(F) i2c_i801(F) lpc_ich(F) mfd_core(F) pps_core(F) dca(F) rtc_cmos(F) acpi_cpufreq(F) wmi(F) button(F) mgag200(F) ttm(F) drm_kms_helper(F) drm(F) i2c_algo_bit(F) sysimgblt(F) sysfillrect(F) i2c_core(F) syscopyarea(F) sd_mod(F) crc_t10dif(F) crct10dif_common(F) mpt2sas(F) raid_class(F) scsi_dh_emc(F) scsi_dh_rdac(F) scsi_dh_alua(F) scsi_dh_hp_sw(F) scsi_dh(F) thermal(F) sata_nv(F) processor(F) piix(F) mptsas(F) mptscsih(F) scsi_transport_sas(F) mptbase(F) megaraid_sas(F) ide_generic(F) ide_core(F) fan(F) thermal_sys(F) hwmon(F) ext3(F) jbd(F) mbcache(F) edd(F)
> at
> > a_piix(F) ahci(F) libahci(F) libata(F) scsi_mod(F) [last unloaded: scsi_debug]
> > [1167966.168102] CPU: 10 PID: 13005 Comm: kworker/10:3 Tainted: GF D IO 3.13.0-rc2-0.9-default #28
>
> That's a rather heavily tainted kernel you are testing there.
FWIW, I'm also seeing this on an untainted 3.14.11 kernel:
[95004.073063] XFS: Assertion failed: !list_empty(&cil->xc_cil), file: fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c, line: 647
[95004.073068] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[95004.073079] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 13368 at fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:99 xfs_log_commit_cil+0x371/0x5a0()
[95004.073081] Modules linked in: af_packet
[95004.073087] CPU: 5 PID: 13368 Comm: kworker/5:4 Not tainted 3.14.11 #18
[95004.073088] Hardware name: Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi/H8DG6/H8DGi, BIOS 2.0b 03/01/2012
[95004.073094] Workqueue: xfs-data/dm-1 xfs_end_io
[95004.073096] 0000000000000000 ffffffff81760b6c ffffffff815b37a1 0000000000000000
[95004.073098] ffffffff8103c3f2 ffff880fe098b900 ffff881e6fcb0d00 ffff880fe098b900
[95004.073100] ffff881e6fcb0dd8 ffff8823bc512600 ffffffff81262db1 0000000000000000
[95004.073103] Call Trace:
[95004.073110] [<ffffffff815b37a1>] ? dump_stack+0x41/0x51
[95004.073114] [<ffffffff8103c3f2>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xb0
[95004.073117] [<ffffffff81262db1>] ? xfs_log_commit_cil+0x371/0x5a0
[95004.073120] [<ffffffff8121687b>] ? xfs_trans_commit+0xcb/0x2c0
[95004.073123] [<ffffffff811f8c9c>] ? xfs_end_io+0x6c/0xe0
[95004.073126] [<ffffffff8105138e>] ? process_one_work+0x13e/0x3b0
[95004.073129] [<ffffffff81051e39>] ? worker_thread+0x109/0x350
[95004.073131] [<ffffffff81051d30>] ? manage_workers.isra.28+0x2c0/0x2c0
[95004.073134] [<ffffffff81057f0c>] ? kthread+0xbc/0xe0
[95004.073136] [<ffffffff81057e50>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x60/0x60
[95004.073139] [<ffffffff815b92fc>] ? ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[95004.073141] [<ffffffff81057e50>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x60/0x60
[95004.073142] ---[ end trace b591fe6842af909e ]---
Any hints?
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-19 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-24 19:37 assert in xfs_log_commit_cil Ben Myers
2014-01-24 22:20 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-24 22:39 ` Ben Myers
2014-07-19 21:02 ` Andre Noll [this message]
2014-07-21 0:04 ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-21 7:40 ` Andre Noll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140719210245.GL17283@slnx.de \
--to=maan@systemlinux.org \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.