Re: ENOSPC errors during balance

[Marc Joliet <marcec@gmx.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1160 bytes --]

Am Tue, 22 Jul 2014 03:26:39 +0000 (UTC)
schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>:

> Marc Joliet posted on Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:30:22 +0200 as excerpted:
> 
> > And now that the background deletion of the old snapshots is done, the file
> > system ended up at:
> > 
> > # btrfs filesystem df /run/media/marcec/MARCEC_BACKUP    
> > Data, single: total=219.00GiB, used=140.13GiB
> > System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=36.00KiB
> > Metadata, DUP: total=4.50GiB, used=2.40GiB
> > unknown, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00
> > 
> > I don't know how reliable du is for this, but I used it to estimate how much
> > used data I should expect, and I get 138 GiB.  That means that the snapshots
> > yield about 2 GiB "overhead", which is very reasonable, I think.  Obviously
> > I'll be starting a full balance now.
> 
[snip total/used discussion]

No, you misunderstand: read my email three steps above yours (from the 21. at
15:22).  I am wondering about why the disk usage ballooned to >200 GiB in the
first place.

-- 
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]