Re: can: flexcan: problems with bus error reporting om i.MX53

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>]

* Matthias Klein | 2014-07-25 20:16:34 [+0200]:

>Hi all,
>
>we had the following problems when we enabled bus error reporting on
>an i.MX537 (Ka-Ro TX53-8130):
>- interrupt flooding when sending a packet on an open bus

This happens because
#1 the ISR always returns that it handled the interrupt even if it did
   nothing
#2 on error the interrupt source remains asserted on an open CAN bus as
   long as the CAN bus is open. This was verified on iMX53 (which has
   FLEXCAN_HAS_BROKEN_ERR_STATE) and imx6q

>- bus state change notifications did not work properly
The error-passive -> error warning transition was not reported to
userland, #3

>- second bus state change after bus recovery was not properly notified
The second transition from error-passive to error-warning does not work
properly. By second is meant a transition while the error counter >0
(in test scenarion  120 < x < 128). After the BUS was closed, the CAN
controller was able to send packages (they were received) but the
internal state said passive mode and the error counter was >128 and
decrementing with each can message sent.
New #4.

>Best regards,
>Matthias Klein

Sebastian