From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2B16DE006F1; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:11:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [212.27.42.2 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A449AE003FA for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (unknown [82.233.81.124]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77C064B00BB; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:10:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:10:56 +0200 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Gary Thomas Message-ID: <20140729221056.5fda40a7@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: <53D7D14C.6000607@mlbassoc.com> References: <53D7C64A.8050602@mlbassoc.com> <20140729183757.11e18c27@e6520eb> <53D7D14C.6000607@mlbassoc.com> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: X11 on i.MX5 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:11:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:52:28 -0600, Gary Thomas a =E9crit : >=20 > On 2014-07-29 10:37, Eric B=E9nard wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > > > Le Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:05:30 -0600, > > Gary Thomas a =E9crit : > > > >> Any ideas what I need to do to get X11 running on this target? > >> > > it seems this package is missing on your target : libgsl-fsl-mx51 >=20 > Interesting - the recipe > meta-fsl-arm/recipes-graphics/amd-gpu-x11-bin/amd-gpu-x11-bin-mx51_11.09.= 01.bb > was built, but there were no libgsl-fsl-mx* packages produced? Here's > all I have: >=20 > $ find tmp/deploy/ipk/ -name "libgsl*" > tmp/deploy/ipk/armv7a-vfp-neon-mx5/libgsl-fsl-dev_11.09.01-r12.0_armv7a-v= fp-neon-mx5.ipk > tmp/deploy/ipk/armv7a-vfp-neon-mx5/libgsl-fsl-dbg_11.09.01-r12.0_armv7a-v= fp-neon-mx5.ipk > tmp/deploy/ipk/armv7a-vfp-neon-mx5/libgsl-fsl1_11.09.01-r12.0_armv7a-vfp-= neon-mx5.ipk >=20 > Any ideas why I don't have any of the rest produced by that recipe? >=20 may you please send the result of bitbake -e amd-gpu-x11-bin-mx51 ? Eric