All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, alan.cox@intel.com, "Gross,
	Mark" <mark.gross@intel.com>,
	"fengguang.wu@intel.com" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:40:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140730004007.GC28673@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140730083008.GD19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:30:08AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > Isn't the entire effort starting from PJT and Ben up to now to soften the extremely
> > dynamic changes (runnable or not, weight change, etc)? Assume task does not change
> > weight much, but group entity does as Peter mentioned.
> 
> No, softening isn't the point at all. But an integrator is the only
> means of predicting the future given the erratic past.
> 
> The whole point we got into this game is to better compute per cpu group
> weights, not to soften stuff, that's just a necessarily evil to more
> accurately predict erratic/unknown behaviour.
> 
> 
Yes, I totally agree. I think what I meant by "soften" is the *effect* of the integrator
that takes/averages the infinite history to predict the tufure.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-30  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-17 23:26 [PATCH 0/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Yuyang Du
2014-07-17 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/2 v4] sched: Remove update_rq_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-07-17 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Yuyang Du
2014-07-18  9:43   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-27 17:36     ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29  9:12       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-29  1:43         ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:17           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-29 22:27             ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-30  8:30               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-30  0:40                 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2014-07-29  9:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  1:53           ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:35             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 15:55               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 23:08               ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-31  9:40             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-31  9:56             ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average Vincent Guittot
2014-07-31 19:16               ` Yuyang Du
2014-08-01  9:28                 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 10:48   ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  0:56     ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 11:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  1:09     ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 12:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 13:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 16:58     ` bsegall
2014-07-28 17:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  1:13         ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-18 15:39 ` [PATCH 0/2 " Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-27 19:02   ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-28 10:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  1:17       ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:06         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-30 10:13     ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-30 10:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-30 10:57         ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-30 19:17       ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-31  8:54         ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-31  2:15           ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-20  5:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-27 19:34   ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-28  7:49     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-28  0:01       ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-28  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140730004007.GC28673@intel.com \
    --to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    --cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.