From: "Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>
To: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: b43-fwcutter: add helper script for getting firmware
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 23:35:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140801233556.7a117cf1@wiggum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACna6ryu_Gw_sF2ec9ZkSoh=cLrX1T2FTt_2s+qkGNzWUcDnwg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 23:26:55 +0200
Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> No heuristics. Extracting any passed archive and looking for binary
> objects in it would *surly* contain some bugs.
>
> We update binaries (lwfinger.com/b43-firmware/) rarely, once a year
> maybe? So having a simple checksum of .tar.bz2 should make the trick.
> I need to know which archive I'm dealing with to know the location of
> .o file only.
I completely agree here.
> > And on the online-functionality:
> > How do you detect which firmware to download? Note that I thought
> > about this in the early bcm43xx days, too. The driver had special
> > versioned MODULE_FIRMWARE markers (that we removed last year or so,
> > because they were horribly outdated), so that an automatic tool
> > could decide what firmware to download. Are you going to decide
> > by kernel version? What for patched/backported kernels? The plain
> > firmware file names from the remaining MODULE_FIRMWAREs probably
> > isn't enough information.
>
> Do you think about problem of using new version of script with old
> kernel? Like using a fresh script wild old kernel that e.g. didn't
> support firmware rev 598+?
Yes.
> What about handling it in a kernel? If we ever start supporting new,
> backward incompatible, version of firmware, maybe we should use
> something like a /lib/firmware/b43-v123/?
Yes, we should _have_ done this. But we didn't.
We could simply ignore old incompatible kernels and in future do this:
> In such situation we could make script prepare both:
> /lib/firmware/b43/
> and
> /lib/firmware/b43-v123/
>
> Script wouldn't need to check for the current kernel then. And user
> could switch between kernels without changing user space.
>
> Does it make sense?
sure.
Do symbolic links to directories work for firmware fetching (Need to check
both udev and in-kernel mechanisms)
--
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/b43-dev/attachments/20140801/38c5c365/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-01 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-01 17:41 b43-fwcutter: add helper script for getting firmware Rafał Miłecki
2014-08-01 18:44 ` Michael Büsch
2014-08-01 21:26 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-08-01 21:35 ` Michael Büsch [this message]
2014-08-01 22:29 ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-02-18 10:03 ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-02-18 16:37 ` Michael Büsch
2015-02-18 17:26 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140801233556.7a117cf1@wiggum \
--to=m@bues.ch \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.