From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4F34CE0079D; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 09:40:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.170 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com (mail-pd0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA24E0030B for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id g10so8326758pdj.1 for ; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 09:40:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=A/ZJJzzbyG3lfyjUL1unhnHryfY07waNORrA/Rxbdg8=; b=LKl7s/pP/m1hZ9q+z1BVVOJ33IPz/+HtbI6WQTwq/6HgYCEVMQp2ZefGZEcF9GXT+X JzjR6zZHBTuYecX//T5kyQhURuTjSP6nemYRY4G8GgpekhgdCCcJU61lW6Rd6xdCKZMe Mgg50qrgnwe+yVCY44iIat2NZWdhGwyYpgr9Up+ulTmqvW7ho16BIBFo/yNbEX4gA13R TfhA5OO8buc/iLh+zyIJKbun59H8+AaFC2N0JLSVKnGlKM+dt1HuhVND7GYjYjnqS48X jmkZSE88fqJtzmVzRrj0AFhWodJP1zS6X9lGsmfo2cmy+BMJ80xdR3QpyrAsjaZe6R+j TGNA== X-Received: by 10.70.36.7 with SMTP id m7mr3221247pdj.91.1407084047526; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 09:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haswell ([2601:9:3580:7a5:baca:3aff:fe80:aa8f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kq7sm14844495pbc.90.2014.08.03.09.40.46 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Aug 2014 09:40:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 09:43:50 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: "Robert P. J. Day" Message-ID: <20140803164350.GA4788@haswell> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: Re: does no one find the "bin_package" class of any use? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:40:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On 14-08-03 03:26:47, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > throughout the dozen or so layers i have on my build host, i have > yet to see a single use of the "bin_package" bbclass file. just > curious as to why it seems to be utterly unused. it is for packaging prebuilt packages e.g. rpms etc. and mostly I expect these things to be in vendor layers who have to deal with third party software with closed licences.