From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 1C21FE007D1; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 13:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FE8E0079D for ; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 13:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id et14so8703324pad.21 for ; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 13:03:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=F/1pkBlDsXS2gyOj8xT9fowPAwMLyDtYkro9OXZcJtA=; b=epuOohTOzaVuu6LJ4MHJzMWCvFICcdEC+PS07vT7VrySTInXtHh8Nxm3UnbKoJyGOs DrFOxoC/mgEy6rgG8DXqujt5LKxLzvJrnh7niCOt+vOkaZUM1BMyib24JX3t+r+KHG3R rbyFbrKSZxbgxCKvecz9sM2fn5z4QfllGHdn5zEa6nmKShOBmMGINa7j/UCll8Yk+1U+ q1kBsU27oPinvQojjNpm4LJorhKjskiRVHd5ONpYKedyuQDHY8M9YK3TOh2INs6FhYAG 71aasM3nLG9V9zoXOvIgQpGN01x28g4L4l2EywiBQe9SB2u8oMFHOSmh/lnva00rXNF5 QOrA== X-Received: by 10.67.30.45 with SMTP id kb13mr19807084pad.16.1407096214591; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 13:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haswell ([2601:9:3580:7a5:baca:3aff:fe80:aa8f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bt5sm18471036pdb.95.2014.08.03.13.03.33 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Aug 2014 13:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 13:06:49 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: "Robert P. J. Day" Message-ID: <20140803200649.GA9373@haswell> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: Re: dev manual, multilib sample code looks wrong X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 20:03:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On 14-08-03 04:48:13, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > dev manual, section 5.5.2.2 suggests example configuration in > local.conf: > > MACHINE = "qemux86-64" > require conf/multilib.conf > MULTILIBS = "multilib:lib32" > DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = "x86" > IMAGE_INSTALL = "lib32-connman" <---- ????????? > > isn't that last assignment going to wipe out the entire typical > assignment to IMAGE_INSTALL? maybe that should be using "_append"? > thoughts? am i just misreading this? Most of images used IMAGE_INSTAL += so this may work in some case but for documentation we should use IMAGE_INSTALL += or append.