All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: <lichunhe@huawei.com>
Cc: <vyasevic@redhat.com>, <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	<makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>, <mst@redhat.com>,
	<ebiederm@xmission.com>, <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <wuyunfei@huawei.com>,
	<qianhuibin@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net/next] bridge:Add rcu read lock when delete br port
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:29:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140804092904.16654a4c@haswell.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407123476-9720-1-git-send-email-lichunhe@huawei.com>

On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:37:56 +0800
<lichunhe@huawei.com> wrote:

> From: Chunhe Li <lichunhe@huawei.com>
> 
> In the br_hanle_frame function has a bug, when the bridge receive packets
> which go througth the br_handle_frame, get the net_bridge_port pointer "p",
> but don't check NULL pointer to use it. If somebody delete the bridge port
> at the same time, will call a NULL pointer, trigger kernel panic. I see the
> del_nbp comments, call del_nbp should via RCU, but the caller don't do this.
> 
> following steps will make bug happened
> 1.start vm and add the vm interface to a bridge br0,for example,
> brctl addbr br0 tap0
> 
> 2.configuer vm interface and br0 same ip subnet, vm ping br0.
> 
> 3.add and delete the vm interface port for endless loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunhe Li <lichunhe@huawei.com>

This is safe because:
 1. br_dev_delete is called with RTNL mutex therefore it is safe with other add/delete
    RCU does not block anything
 2. br_handle_frame is called with RCU lock (in frame rx)
 3. port is not freed until after grace period

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-04 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-04  3:37 [PATCH net/next] bridge:Add rcu read lock when delete br port lichunhe
2014-08-04 12:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-08-05  0:43   ` Lichunhe
2014-08-05 10:07     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-08-04 16:29 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2014-08-04 16:48 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140804092904.16654a4c@haswell.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=lichunhe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qianhuibin@huawei.com \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    --cc=wuyunfei@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.