From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 04:34:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140804113404.GA11377@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140804213059.32fd25d5@canb.auug.org.au>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> You realise that neither of these in linux-next as the scsi-core and
> scsi-drivers trees had for-3.16 branches in the last round. I assume I
> should just drop these trees completely from linux-next?
Well, they get pulled in through James, so you can drop them for now.
I mostly put you on Cc so you could comment wether there are any hard
rules on how long even those simple fixes should be in linux-next. I
know you've put up stats for a few of the last merge windows about
patches that weren't in linux-next, so there's been some tracking of it
for sure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-04 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-08 13:40 [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-01 12:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-01 20:32 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-04 11:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-04 11:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-04 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-08-04 11:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-04 14:20 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-14 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-14 17:47 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-15 19:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-15 19:32 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-21 19:33 ` adam radford
2014-08-21 19:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-21 20:00 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-08-21 20:26 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-08-21 21:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-15 22:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-16 21:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-16 21:44 ` James Bottomley
2014-12-30 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-18 10:02 Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-25 21:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140804113404.GA11377@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.