From: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Alan Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>,
Petri Gynther <pgynther@google.com>,
Jun-Ru Chang <jrjang@gmail.com>,
cminyard@mvista.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Ftrace: Fix dynamic tracing of kernel modules
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:11:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140808120113-tung7970@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140807212514.GD29898@linux-mips.org>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 11:25:14PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:12:06PM -0400, Alan Cooper wrote:
>
> > Actually , there's no reason to write the second NOP when nop'ing the
> > mcount call site in a module. This was done to remove the stack adjust
> > instruction which only exists at this location for internal kernel
> > routines. The following diff seems like a simpler way to solve issue
> > #1:
>
> Oh?
>
> $ mips-linux-objdump -d --reloc net/sctp/sctp.ko
> [...]
> 00000000 <sctp_sm_lookup_event>:
> 0: 27bdffe8 addiu sp,sp,-24
> 4: afbf0014 sw ra,20(sp)
> 8: 3c030000 lui v1,0x0
> 8: R_MIPS_HI16 _mcount
> c: 24630000 addiu v1,v1,0
> c: R_MIPS_LO16 _mcount
> 10: 03e00821 move at,ra
> 14: 27ac0014 addiu t4,sp,20
> 18: 0060f809 jalr v1
> 1c: 27bdfff8 addiu sp,sp,-8 <====
> [...]
> 64: 27bd0018 addiu sp,sp,24
> 68: 03e00008 jr ra
> [...]
>
> So the stack adjustment also exists for modules.
>
> Or am I missunderstanding something?
>
> Ralf
>
We have a workaround for dynamic ftrace under 32bit mode back in Feburary. I thought
it is not good enough but maybe this is the right solution for issue #1 ?
Tony
commit d3167328b1bd63c22abb129a17fcb658e11c2a7b
Author: Jun-Ru Chang <jrjang@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Feb 27 15:23:34 2014 +0800
mips: ftrace: fix ftrace_make_call long call restore
In case of long call under 32bit mode, two instructions,
lui and addiu, are required to load the mcount address into
the jump register.
In ftrace_make_nop, both instructions are marked as nop, so
in ftrace_make_call, we have to restore both of them.
Signed-off-by: Jun-Ru Chang <jrjang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com>
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/mips/kernel/ftrace.c
index 9bb8bcd..b12858c 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ static inline int in_kernel_space(unsigned long ip)
static unsigned int insn_jal_ftrace_caller __read_mostly;
static unsigned int insn_lui_v1_hi16_mcount __read_mostly;
+#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
+static unsigned int insn_add_v1_lo16_mcount __read_mostly;
+#endif
static unsigned int insn_j_ftrace_graph_caller __maybe_unused __read_mostly;
static inline void ftrace_dyn_arch_init_insns(void)
@@ -73,6 +76,12 @@ static inline void ftrace_dyn_arch_init_insns(void)
buf = (u32 *)&insn_lui_v1_hi16_mcount;
UASM_i_LA_mostly(&buf, v1, MCOUNT_ADDR);
+#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
+ /* addiu v1, vi, lo16_mcount */
+ buf = (u32 *)&insn_add_v1_lo16_mcount;
+ UASM_i_LA(&buf, v1, MCOUNT_ADDR);
+#endif
+
/* jal (ftrace_caller + 8), jump over the first two instruction */
buf = (u32 *)&insn_jal_ftrace_caller;
uasm_i_jal(&buf, (FTRACE_ADDR + 8) & JUMP_RANGE_MASK);
@@ -180,7 +189,10 @@ int ftrace_make_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
new = in_kernel_space(ip) ? insn_jal_ftrace_caller :
insn_lui_v1_hi16_mcount;
- return ftrace_modify_code(ip, new);
+ if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_64BIT) || new == insn_jal_ftrace_caller)
+ return ftrace_modify_code(ip, new);
+ else
+ return ftrace_modify_code_2(ip, new, insn_add_v1_lo16_mcount);
}
#define FTRACE_CALL_IP ((unsigned long)(&ftrace_call))
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-08 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-24 5:55 [PATCH] MIPS: Ftrace: Fix dynamic tracing of kernel modules Petri Gynther
2014-08-05 16:41 ` Alan Cooper
[not found] ` <CAGXr9JE7v9-hS3irmdgeaEU2iGLZHshEr_N-Do1UAsZhyzMe2g@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-06 17:12 ` Alan Cooper
2014-08-07 21:25 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-08-08 4:11 ` Tony Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140808120113-tung7970@googlemail.com \
--to=tung7970@gmail.com \
--cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=jrjang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=pgynther@google.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.