From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
mcgrof@do-not-panic.com, tiwai@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp,
joseph.salisbury@canonical.com, kay@vrfy.org,
gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
pierre-fersing@pierref.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
oleg@redhat.com, bpoirier@suse.de,
nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com,
praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com,
sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com, abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com,
hariprasad@chelsio.com, santosh@chelsio.com,
MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: enable drivers to use deferred probe from init
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 20:43:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140810124331.GE30451@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140809164119.GI21930@wotan.suse.de>
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 06:41:19PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:11:07PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
> > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:28:28 -0700
> >
> > > Tetsuo bisected and found that commit 786235ee "kthread: make
> > > kthread_create() killable" modified kthread_create() to bail as
> > > soon as SIGKILL is received. This is causing some issues with
> > > some drivers and at times boot. Joseph then found that failures
> > > occur as the systemd-udevd process sends SIGKILL to modprobe if
> > > probe on a driver takes over 30 seconds. When this happens probe
> > > will fail on any driver, its why booting on some system will fail
> > > if the driver happens to be a storage related driver. Some folks
> > > have suggested fixing this by modifying kthread_create() to not
> > > leave upon SIGKILL [3], upon review Oleg rejected this change and
> > > the discussion was punted out to systemd to see if the default
> > > timeout could be increased from 30 seconds to 120. The opinion of
> > > the systemd maintainers is that the driver's behavior should
> > > be fixed [4]. Linus seems to agree [5], however more recently even
> > > networking drivers have been reported to fail on probe since just
> > > writing the firmware to a device and kicking it can take easy over
> > > 60 seconds [6]. Benjamim was able to trace the issues recently
> > > reported on cxgb4 down to the same systemd-udevd 30 second timeout [6].
> > >
> > > This is an alternative solution which enables drivers that are
> > > known to take long to use deferred probe workqueue. This avoids
> > > the 30 second timeout and lets us annotate drivers with long
> > > init sequences.
> > >
> > > As drivers determine a component is not yet available and needs
> > > to defer probe you'll be notified this happen upon init for each
> > > device but now with a message such as:
> > >
> > > pci 0000:03:00.0: Driver cxgb4 requests probe deferral on init
> > >
> > > You should see one of these per struct device probed.
> >
> > It seems we're still discussing this.
> >
> > I think I understand all of the underlying issues, and what I'll say
> > is that perhaps we should use what Greg KH requested but via a helper
> > that is easy to grep for.
> >
> > I don't care if it's something like "module_long_probe_init()" and
> > "module_long_probe_exit()", but it just needs to be some properly
> > named interface which does the whole kthread or whatever bit.
>
> I've tested the alternative kthread_run() proposal but unfortunately it
> does not help resolve the issue, the timeout is still hit and a SIGKILL
> still kills the driver probe. Please let me know how you'd all like us
> to proceed, these defer probe patches do help cure the issue though.
Why doesn't it work? Doesn't modprobe come right back and the init
sequence still takes a while to run? What exactly fails?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-10 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-28 18:28 [PATCH v2 0/4] driver core: allow explicit deferred probe preference Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-28 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] driver core: move deferred probe add / remove helpers down a bit Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-28 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: enable drivers to use deferred probe from init Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-28 18:55 ` Greg KH
2014-07-28 19:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-28 19:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-28 23:46 ` Greg KH
2014-07-28 23:46 ` Greg KH
2014-07-29 0:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-29 0:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-29 0:35 ` Greg KH
2014-07-29 0:35 ` Greg KH
2014-07-29 1:13 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-29 1:13 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-29 6:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-07-29 6:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-07-29 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: enable drivers to use deferred probefrom init Tetsuo Handa
2014-07-29 22:25 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-07-30 0:14 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-30 2:22 ` Tetsuo Handa
2014-07-30 14:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-29 23:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: enable drivers to use deferred probe from init Greg KH
2014-07-29 23:14 ` Greg KH
2014-07-30 0:05 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-30 0:05 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-30 0:13 ` Greg KH
2014-07-30 0:13 ` Greg KH
2014-07-30 22:11 ` David Miller
2014-08-09 16:41 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-10 12:43 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-08-10 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: enable drivers to use deferred probefrom init Tetsuo Handa
2014-08-10 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: enable drivers to use deferred probe from init Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-11 15:27 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-08-11 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-11 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-11 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-28 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cxgb4: ask for deferred probe Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-07-28 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mptsas: " Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140810124331.GE30451@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com \
--cc=abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpoirier@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hariprasad@chelsio.com \
--cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pierre-fersing@pierref.org \
--cc=praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com \
--cc=santosh@chelsio.com \
--cc=sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.