From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754556AbaHNTce (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:32:34 -0400 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([193.35.52.29]:46874 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752444AbaHNTcd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:32:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:32:18 +0200 From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [tip:locking/arch] locking,arch,avr32: Fold atomic_ops Message-ID: <20140814193218.GA26558@samfundet.no> References: <20140531141445.GD16155@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140814192720.GA16175@samfundet.no> <20140814193014.GX6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140814193014.GX6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Around Thu 14 Aug 2014 21:30:14 +0200 or thereabout, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:27:20PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: >> Around Thu 14 Aug 2014 10:19:44 -0700 or thereabout, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > Commit-ID: d325209b6000dcd13404ee946d2292e15a56718c >> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d325209b6000dcd13404ee946d2292e15a56718c >> > Author: Peter Zijlstra >> > AuthorDate: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 21:51:29 +0200 >> > Committer: Ingo Molnar >> > CommitDate: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:48:05 +0200 >> > >> > locking,arch,avr32: Fold atomic_ops >> > >> > Many of the atomic op implementations are the same except for one >> > instruction; fold the lot into a few CPP macros and reduce LoC. >> > >> > This also prepares for easy addition of new ops. >> > >> > Requires the asm_op because of eor. >> > >> > AVR32 is a bit special in that its ADD/SUB instructions are not >> > symmetric. Its SUB instruction allows for an 21bit immediate. >> >> Fantastic, looks great. >> >> Do you have any plans for merge route? I'll happily do it through the avr32 >> tree, but if it is part of another series, it makes most sense to do it >> there. > > I was thinking to keep the lot together in tip/locking/arch. > > Once that lands, I'll need to clean up and send pass 3, which > _hopefully_ will be the last, although I had vague plans for a 4th as > well. OK, you have my ack, so go ahead and merge when you feel fit. -- mvh Hans-Christian Egtvedt