All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Osterhoff <mo@mo-online.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TYPO 9/9] [typo] spelling, punctuation in Documentation/...
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:46:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140818084600.GA13463@mo-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F1AD31.3030109@infradead.org>

Dear Randy,

thanks for you reply.

* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> [140818 09:37]:
> On 08/17/14 11:30, Markus Osterhoff wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/HOWTO b/Documentation/HOWTO
> > -gcc`) for some information on them.
> > +gcc') for some information on them.
> Backquotes imply that the contents (string) can be entered at a shell prompt;
> i.e., they are a command.
Ah, I see.

> > -It is worth mentioning what Andrew Morton wrote on the linux-kernel
> > +It is worth mentioning what Andrew Morton wrote on the Linux-kernel
> The mailing list is "linux-kernel".
Stupid me, sorry :)

> > diff --git a/Documentation/ManagementStyle b/Documentation/ManagementStyle
> > -Btw, when talking about "kernel manager", it's all about the technical
> > +Btw., when talking about "kernel manager", it's all about the technical
> BTW (or Btw) is common -- no period.
Okay.

> > diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> > index 0a523c9..a358031 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> > +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> > @@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ Linux kernel.  His e-mail address is <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>.
> >  He gets a lot of e-mail, so typically you should do your best to -avoid-
> >  sending him e-mail. 
> >  
> > -Patches which are bug fixes, are "obvious" changes, or similarly
> > -require little discussion should be sent or CC'd to Linus.  Patches
> > +Patches, which are bug fixes, are "obvious" changes, or similarly
> 
>    Patches which are bug fixes or "obvious" changes or similarly
> 
> > +require little discussion, should be sent or CC'd to Linus.  Patches
>   why the added comma?
My feeling is this increases the comprehensibility.

> >  which require discussion or do not have a clear advantage should
> >  usually be sent first to linux-kernel.  Only after the patch is
> >  discussed should the patch then be submitted to Linus.
Greetings,
Markus


      reply	other threads:[~2014-08-18  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-17 18:30 [TYPO 9/9] [typo] spelling, punctuation in Documentation/ Markus Osterhoff
2014-08-18  7:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-08-18  8:46   ` Markus Osterhoff [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140818084600.GA13463@mo-online.de \
    --to=mo@mo-online.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.