From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: "João Pedro Taveira" <joao.p.taveira@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mac802154: TX results and ACK processing
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:56:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140819165640.GC1116@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ018wCNUhoJQvM+bYFGqEui1KLZjHe_X3ieYr_+hVcJXQkffA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 05:27:43PM +0100, João Pedro Taveira wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I thought RPL needs the LQI value. For the LQI value I (we) thought about
> > to handle the LQI value like the wireless signal strength.
> RPL doesn't need LQI.It depends on RPL configurations and parameters,
> which metrics it will use. One could setup RPL to use metrics based on
> ETX, LQI, battery voltage, mains, temperature, ... sky is the limit.
ok, we currently doesn't offer any of these information.
> >
> > If you have a wireless card, simple type:
> >
> > "iw dev $WLAN_DEV scan dump" (maybe you need to run a scan first). You will
> > see all access points and their signal strength etc.
> >
> > We should have something similar for all neighbor nodes and LQI values,
> > tx failures and similar information.
> >
> >> What's your opinion?
> >>
> >
> > I think we should get a working mac layer with a working 6LoWPAN layer
> > at first, then we can do effort to implement RPL or RFC6775.
> RPL works on IPv6 layer, it doesn't depend on 6lowpan. I already
> started to implement several RFCs but not MHROF. Right now, I can
> connect linux and contiki sensors using rpl_of_of0, but this is the
> basic. To get mhrof working with default configurations as defined on
> RFCs, ETX should be available. My problem is that RPL works on IPv6
> layer, but ETX it's only available on link layer. Some abstraction
> should be available to allow implementation of RPL metrics and RPL
> Objective functions to make use of any metrics on existing link
> protocols.
>
Okay, then this is a general question to your implementation. Maybe you
ask this on netdev and not related to 802.15.4/802.15.4 6LoWPAN. It's
more a IPv6 question.
We don't support to offer these information in any case. Maybe you want
to try to implement/test your RPL implementation for 802.11, there you
have more change to access information like this. Maybe in future we
offer these information in mac802154.
- Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-19 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-19 13:33 mac802154: TX results and ACK processing João Pedro Taveira
2014-08-19 15:23 ` Alexander Aring
2014-08-19 16:27 ` João Pedro Taveira
2014-08-19 16:56 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140819165640.GC1116@omega \
--to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=joao.p.taveira@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.