From: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: net_ns cleanup / RCU overhead
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 22:58:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140820055855.GB5579@hostway.ca> (raw)
Hello!
In trying to figure out what happened to a box running lots of vsftpd
since we deployed a CONFIG_NET_NS=y kernel to it, we found that the
(wall) time needed for cleanup_net() to complete, even on an idle box,
can be quite long:
#!/bin/bash
ip netns delete test >&/dev/null
while ip netns add test; do
echo hi
ip netns delete test
done
On my desktop and typical hosts, this prints at only around 4 or 6 per
second. While this is happening, "vmstat 1" reports 100% idle, and there
there are D-state processes with stacks similar to:
30566 [kworker/u16:1] D wait_rcu_gp+0x48, synchronize_sched+0x2f, cleanup_net+0xdb, process_one_work+0x175, worker_thread+0x119, kthread+0xbb, ret_from_fork+0x7c, 0xffffffffffffffff
32220 ip D copy_net_ns+0x68, create_new_namespaces+0xfc, unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x66, SyS_unshare+0x159, system_call_fastpath+0x16, 0xffffffffffffffff
copy_net_ns() is waiting on net_mutex which is held by cleanup_net().
vsftpd uses CLONE_NEWNET to set up privsep processes. There is a comment
about it being really slow before 2.6.35 (it avoids CLONE_NEWNET in that
case). I didn't find anything that makes 2.6.35 any faster, but on Debian
2.6.36-5-amd64, I notice it does seem to be a bit faster than 3.2, 3.10,
3.16, though still not anything I'd ever want to rely on per connection.
C implementation of the above: http://0x.ca/sim/ref/tools/netnsloop.c
Kernel stack "top": http://0x.ca/sim/ref/tools/pstack
What's going on here?
Simon-
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-20 5:58 Simon Kirby [this message]
2014-08-28 19:24 ` net_ns cleanup / RCU overhead Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-28 19:44 ` Simon Kirby
2014-08-28 20:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-28 20:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-29 0:40 ` Simon Kirby
2014-08-29 3:57 ` Julian Anastasov
2014-08-29 21:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-29 23:52 ` Florian Westphal
2014-08-30 2:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-30 8:20 ` Julian Anastasov
2014-08-30 2:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140820055855.GB5579@hostway.ca \
--to=sim@hostway.ca \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.