From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from v6.tansi.org (ns.km31936-01.keymachine.de [87.118.116.4]) by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:46:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gatewagner.dyndns.org (77-57-44-24.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.57.44.24]) by v6.tansi.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0D51A20DC1EA for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:46:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:46:20 +0200 From: Arno Wagner Message-ID: <20140822114620.GA3837@tansi.org> References: <20140820090956.GA25262@tansi.org> <20140820211528.GA450@tansi.org> <53F61AA4.70309@freesources.org> <20140822053032.GA8719@fritha.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140822053032.GA8719@fritha.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] "not a valid LUKS device" after distro change List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:30:32 CEST, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 21.08.2014, John Wells wrote: > > > The inconsistent behavior is really disconcerting. > > Another possibility is that the software relevant to your problem is > patched different. Most of the distributions out there doesn't manage > to keep their fingers off the original sourcecode. This could have > introduced the behaviour you're encountering. Good point. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@wagner.name GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. - Plato