From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E0CCBE00894; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:17:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [212.27.42.5 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696E0E0084D for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (unknown [88.170.243.169]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E2B0D4808A; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:17:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:17:21 +0200 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: Otavio Salvador Message-ID: <20140822171721.5f4001c7@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: References: <1408718282-24425-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <20140822165239.45e9c31d@e6520eb> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm/daisy][PATCH 00/21] Bugfix and improvement backports X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:17:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:05:38 -0300, Otavio Salvador a =E9crit : >=20 > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Eric B=E9nard wrote: > > Hi Otavio, > > > > Le Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:38:00 -0300, > > Otavio Salvador a =E9crit : > >> Lauren Post (3): > >> gpu-viv-bin-mx6q: Upgrade to 3.10.17-1.0.1 > >> xf86-video-imxfb-vivante: Upgrade to 3.10.17-1.0.1 > >> linux-imx: Upgrade to 3.10.17-1.0.1 > > > > one little question : if you upgrade daisy to 3.10.17-1.0.1, > > doesn't that mean that in the end next 1.7 release will have the same > > BSP as daisy (1.6) ? >=20 > The 3.10.17-1.0.1 is a bugfix release of the GA BSP, as you can see > from the commit log provided by Lauren on the patches it is indeed a > fix on top of the GA. >=20 > If new bugfix releases happen to be released, 3.10.17-1.0.x, the > natural thing is to put them on the branches which are affected. As > done in all other layers. >=20 that's indeed a good pratice. > > one little remark : maybe some votes would be different if peoples were > > aware that the 3.10.17-1.0.1 was to be backported in 1.6 instead of > > being replaced by 3.10.31 in 1.7 (which would have mean no meta-fsl-arm > > release would have included this version). >=20 > The 3.10.31-1.1.0 is a major update and not just a bugfix. Even > Freescale thing it is not ready otherwise it'd be called GA (not > Beta). So I think the difference is clear enough... >=20 my concern was not the stability discussion but the fact that latest 3.10.17-1.0.x would be available in the 1.6 BSP which could allow people not wanting to move to 3.10.31 to use it. Best regards Eric