From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752506AbaHWIuN (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2014 04:50:13 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]:40970 "EHLO mail-lb0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752145AbaHWIuK (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2014 04:50:10 -0400 Message-Id: <20140823084611.939722362@openvz.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1 Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:46:11 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, oleg@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, avagin@openvz.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com, xemul@parallels.com, segoon@openwall.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, jln@google.com Subject: [patch 0/2 -mm] prctl: PR_SET_MM_MAP -- Drop race window and simplify validate_prctl_map_locked Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, here I addressed the comments from previous review pass (thanks a lot for the comments btw). Please take a look. While these changes are sitting in -mm tree we've an option to improve struct prctl_mm_map definition (versioning and such. personally i don't see a need to add some new @version field into it at moment but more opinions are welcome!).