All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 2/2] net: fec_mxc: Poll FEC_TBD_READY after polling TDAR
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:51:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201408252151.31422.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408984457-10272-2-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com>

On Monday, August 25, 2014 at 06:34:17 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> When testing the FEC driver on a mx6solox we noticed that the TDAR bit gets
> always cleared prior then the READY bit is cleared in the last BD, which
> causes FEC packets reception to always fail.
> 
> As explained by Ye Li:
> 
> "The TDAR bit is cleared when the descriptors are all out from TX ring, but
> on mx6solox we noticed that the READY bit is still not cleared right after
> TDAR. These are two distinct signals, and in IC simulation, we found that
> TDAR always gets cleared prior than the READY bit of last BD becomes
> cleared.
> In mx6solox, we use a later version of FEC IP. It looks like that this
> intrinsic behaviour of TDAR bit has changed in this newer FEC version."
> 
> Fix this by polling the READY bit of BD after the TDAR polling, which
> covers the mx6solox case and does not harm the other SoCs.
> 
> No performance drop has been noticed with this patch applied when testing
> TFTP transfers on several boards of different i.mx SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>

Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-25 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-25 16:34 [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 1/2] net: fec_mxc: Adjust RX DMA alignment for mx6solox Fabio Estevam
2014-08-25 16:34 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 2/2] net: fec_mxc: Poll FEC_TBD_READY after polling TDAR Fabio Estevam
2014-08-25 19:51   ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2014-09-09 13:10   ` Stefano Babic
2014-08-25 19:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 1/2] net: fec_mxc: Adjust RX DMA alignment for mx6solox Marek Vasut
2014-08-30 17:22   ` Fabio Estevam
2014-08-30 19:21     ` Tom Rini
2014-09-08 23:52       ` Fabio Estevam
2014-09-09 13:09         ` Stefano Babic
2014-09-09 13:37           ` Fabio Estevam
2014-09-03 22:21 ` Fabio Estevam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201408252151.31422.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.