From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
PowerPC email list <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Fix warning reported by verify_cpu_node_mapping()
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:17:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140826151716.GA19690@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FC8736.8080000@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Nathan,
On 26.08.2014 [08:10:14 -0500], Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> On 08/25/2014 02:22 AM, Li Zhong wrote:
> > With commit 2fabf084b, during boottime, cpu_numa_callback() is called
> > earlier(before their online) for each cpu, and verify_cpu_node_mapping()
> > uses cpu_to_node() to check whether siblings are in the same node.
> >
> > It skips the checking for siblings that are not online yet. So the only
> > check done here is for the bootcpu, which is online at that time. But
> > the per-cpu numa_node cpu_to_node() uses hasn't been set up yet (which
> > will be set up in smp_prepare_cpus()).
> >
> > So I saw something like following reported:
> > [ 0.000000] CPU thread siblings 1/2/3 and 0 don't belong to the same
> > node!
> >
> > As we don't actually do the checking during this early stage, so maybe
> > we could directly call numa_setup_cpu() in do_init_bootmem().
> >
> > Also, as Nish suggested, here it's better to use present cpu mask
> > instead of possible mask to avoid warning in numa_setup_cpu().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > index d7737a5..3a9061e 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> > @@ -1127,9 +1127,8 @@ void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
> > * even before we online them, so that we can use cpu_to_{node,mem}
> > * early in boot, cf. smp_prepare_cpus().
> > */
> > - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > - cpu_numa_callback(&ppc64_numa_nb, CPU_UP_PREPARE,
> > - (void *)(unsigned long)cpu);
> > + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> > + numa_setup_cpu((unsigned long)cpu);
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> I am getting the following error on my system booting with this patch.
With the patch below, you don't get the error, I assume? Does it boot
fully in that case?
-Nish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-26 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 8:14 [RFC PATCH powerpc] Fix warning reported by verify_cpu_node_mapping() Li Zhong
2014-08-21 15:45 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-22 2:12 ` Li Zhong
2014-08-22 22:04 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-08-25 6:01 ` Li Zhong
2014-08-25 7:22 ` [PATCH v2] powerpc: " Li Zhong
2014-08-26 13:10 ` Nathan Fontenot
2014-08-26 15:17 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2014-08-27 1:41 ` Li Zhong
2014-08-27 9:10 ` Li Zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140826151716.GA19690@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.