From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 8A29FE00576; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:00:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433AFE0054C for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id bj1so23961701pad.25 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Hzw0YbKZsT57nzSMWRUu2bohLVWHcAWHlIISZiT/BCc=; b=SCM3p5OLICBfPtIwGIJZjL2BUlDU+rBBvlj/RCQ6txunywgbC9Q+o6P9mv9bKB2D6v 973st2cMyUGwxb16OUNvdEXOBVxD1+sS7/x1Dxc6vD6oP4it6tbldnm6cSH+14AX4/bH ZV+ptN82NT3civoPzd8r6ko5A9ygYulgHk9QCYTvolf2G9Ja/qYO52tLAU8QhfS5oUe1 H01IfcPopMXVKK1C5snvbauAaJMmEJZQad6Ijnzdv8yEKt8nKcmG5Ag+CkGxmEetJHYs X77ukaERC82VFrHxM3UGIQW/T4YkqjruB6/d5BDby7QaNmNP2PSJTyQ6YxePYU5i8G3U Zs4w== X-Received: by 10.66.243.208 with SMTP id xa16mr38928517pac.41.1409083204880; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haswell ([2601:9:3580:7a5:baca:3aff:fe80:aa8f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nh11sm6120499pdb.69.2014.08.26.13.00.03 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:03:48 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: "Crast, Nicholas" Message-ID: <20140826200348.GG18989@haswell> References: <36A43B0E1E88D84791516F9D44BC48331B3C9E7D@corpmail01.corp.sensis.com> <20140825053448.GD1014@haswell> <36A43B0E1E88D84791516F9D44BC48331B3CA7E5@corpmail01.corp.sensis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <36A43B0E1E88D84791516F9D44BC48331B3CA7E5@corpmail01.corp.sensis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Using uboot to boot a large uimage X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:00:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On 14-08-26 18:41:22, Crast, Nicholas wrote: > I am currently attempting to boot with an initramfs built into my uimage using uboot. > > However, I cannot get it to boot correctly. If I make the uimage totally bare-bones, and just use core-image-minimal-initramfs, then it hangs huring init at the waiting for devices... printout. Going and gutting the init script, I can get to single user mode and it looks like the filesystem is there. > > I want a more full system, so I included core-image-boot and core-image-basic. I figured this would initialize better. When I do this, my uImage jumps up to ~50MB. U-boot then hangs at "starting kernel..." > core-image-minimal should boot you into shell console. That should have been enough > I don't think that the uimage is clobbering the device tree, because the device tree is loaded at 0x100, and the uimage is loaded at 0x8000. > make sure that memory is not overlapping and is initiaized