From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole.
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:34:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140827103412.GA24545@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H5R_nemONu2T2Fzwb7hCVEz7S+Zv0ctSfvRwe3LBHP11Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:41:14AM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:16:10PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >> btrfs_punch_hole() will truncate unaligned pages or punch hole on a
> >> already existed hole.
> >> This will cause unneeded zero page or holes splitting the original huge
> >> hole.
> >>
> >> This patch will skip already existed holes before any page truncating or
> >> hole punching.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/btrfs/file.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> >> index ae6af07..93915d1 100644
> >> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> >> @@ -2168,6 +2168,37 @@ out:
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/*
> >> + * Find a hole extent on given inode and change start/len to the end of hole
> >> + * extent.(hole/vacuum extent whose em->start <= start &&
> >> + * em->start + em->len > start)
> >> + * When a hole extent is found, return 1 and modify start/len.
> >> + */
> >> +static int find_first_non_hole(struct inode *inode, u64 *start, u64 *len)
> >> +{
> >> + struct extent_map *em;
> >> + int ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + em = btrfs_get_extent(inode, NULL, 0, *start, *len, 0);
> >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(em)) {
> >> + if (!em)
> >> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> + else
> >> + ret = PTR_ERR(em);
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* Hole or vacuum extent(only exists in no-hole mode) */
> >> + if (em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_HOLE) {
> >> + ret = 1;
> >> + *len = em->start + em->len > *start + *len ?
> >> + 0 : *start + *len - em->start - em->len;
> >> + *start = em->start + em->len;
> >> + }
> >> + free_extent_map(em);
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> {
> >> struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
> >> @@ -2175,17 +2206,18 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> struct btrfs_path *path;
> >> struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv;
> >> struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> >> - u64 lockstart = round_up(offset, BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize);
> >> - u64 lockend = round_down(offset + len,
> >> - BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize) - 1;
> >> - u64 cur_offset = lockstart;
> >> + u64 lockstart;
> >> + u64 lockend;
> >> + u64 tail_start;
> >> + u64 tail_len;
> >> + u64 orig_start = offset;
> >> + u64 cur_offset;
> >> u64 min_size = btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(root, 1);
> >> u64 drop_end;
> >> int ret = 0;
> >> int err = 0;
> >> int rsv_count;
> >> - bool same_page = ((offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) ==
> >> - ((offset + len - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT));
> >> + bool same_page;
> >> bool no_holes = btrfs_fs_incompat(root->fs_info, NO_HOLES);
> >> u64 ino_size = round_up(inode->i_size, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> >>
> >> @@ -2194,6 +2226,21 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >> + ret = find_first_non_hole(inode, &offset, &len);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + if (ret && !len) {
> >> + /* Already in a large hole */
> >> + ret = 0;
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + lockstart = round_up(offset , BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize);
> >> + lockend = round_down(offset + len,
> >> + BTRFS_I(inode)->root->sectorsize) - 1;
> >
> > Why do we round_up lockstart but round_down lockend?
> >
> > For [0,4095], then lockstart is 4096 and lockend is (u64)-1, any thoughts?
>
> Seems odd, but is it a problem for that case?
> The same_page check below makes us return without locking the range in
> the iotree using the computed values for lockstart and lockend.
No problems so far luckily, but it's odd.
thanks,
-liubo
>
> >
> > thanks,
> > -liubo
> >
> >> + same_page = ((offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) ==
> >> + ((offset + len - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT));
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * We needn't truncate any page which is beyond the end of the file
> >> * because we are sure there is no data there.
> >> @@ -2205,8 +2252,7 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> if (same_page && len < PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
> >> if (offset < ino_size)
> >> ret = btrfs_truncate_page(inode, offset, len, 0);
> >> - mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >> - return ret;
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* zero back part of the first page */
> >> @@ -2218,12 +2264,39 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> - /* zero the front end of the last page */
> >> - if (offset + len < ino_size) {
> >> - ret = btrfs_truncate_page(inode, offset + len, 0, 1);
> >> - if (ret) {
> >> - mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >> - return ret;
> >> + /* Check the aligned pages after the first unaligned page,
> >> + * if offset != orig_start, which means the first unaligned page
> >> + * including serveral following pages are already in holes,
> >> + * the extra check can be skipped */
> >> + if (offset == orig_start) {
> >> + /* after truncate page, check hole again */
> >> + len = offset + len - lockstart;
> >> + offset = lockstart;
> >> + ret = find_first_non_hole(inode, &offset, &len);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + if (ret && !len) {
> >> + ret = 0;
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + }
> >> + lockstart = offset;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* Check the tail unaligned part is in a hole */
> >> + tail_start = lockend + 1;
> >> + tail_len = offset + len - tail_start;
> >> + if (tail_len) {
> >> + ret = find_first_non_hole(inode, &tail_start, &tail_len);
> >> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + if (!ret) {
> >> + /* zero the front end of the last page */
> >> + if (tail_start + tail_len < ino_size) {
> >> + ret = btrfs_truncate_page(inode,
> >> + tail_start + tail_len, 0, 1);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto out_only_mutex;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -2299,6 +2372,8 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> BUG_ON(ret);
> >> trans->block_rsv = rsv;
> >>
> >> + cur_offset = lockstart;
> >> + len = lockend - cur_offset;
> >> while (cur_offset < lockend) {
> >> ret = __btrfs_drop_extents(trans, root, inode, path,
> >> cur_offset, lockend + 1,
> >> @@ -2339,6 +2414,14 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> >> rsv, min_size);
> >> BUG_ON(ret); /* shouldn't happen */
> >> trans->block_rsv = rsv;
> >> +
> >> + ret = find_first_non_hole(inode, &cur_offset, &len);
> >> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> >> + break;
> >> + if (ret && !len) {
> >> + ret = 0;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (ret) {
> >> @@ -2372,6 +2455,7 @@ out_free:
> >> out:
> >> unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart, lockend,
> >> &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> >> +out_only_mutex:
> >> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >> if (ret && !err)
> >> err = ret;
> >> --
> >> 1.9.3
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-30 7:16 [PATCH] btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole Qu Wenruo
2014-08-06 18:58 ` Filipe David Manana
2014-08-07 0:41 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-08-27 8:19 ` Liu Bo
2014-08-27 8:41 ` Filipe David Manana
2014-08-27 10:34 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2014-09-01 1:06 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140827103412.GA24545@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.