All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	hannes@stressinduktion.org, edumazet@google.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	dborkman@redhat.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Get rid of ndo_xmit_flush
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:19:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140827141918.198cba38@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140825.163458.1117073971092495452.davem@davemloft.net>

On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> Given Jesper's performance numbers, it's not the way to go.
> 
> Instead, go with a signalling scheme via new boolean skb->xmit_more.
> 
> This has several advantages:
> 
> 1) Nearly trivial driver support, just protect the tail pointer
>    update with the skb->xmit_more check.
> 
> 2) No extra indirect calls in the non-deferral cases.

Even-though it is obvious that this new API skb->xmit_more will not
hurt performance, especially given skb->xmit_more is always 0 in this
kernel, I've still run my pktgen performance tests.

Compared to baseline[1]: (averaged 5609929 pps) (details below signature)
 * (1/5609929*10^9)-(1/5603728*10^9) = -0.197ns

As expected, this API does not hurt performance (as -0.197ns is below
our accuracy levels).

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/327254/focus=327838
-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

Results: on branch bulking02
----------------------------

Kernel with skb->xmit_more API.

Kernel at:
 * commit a3d1214688d ("neigh: document gc_thresh2")

With no HT:
 * ethtool -C eth5 rx-usecs 30
 * tuned-adm profile latency-performance
Results (pktgen):
 * instant rx:1 tx:5604056 pps n:250 average: rx:1 tx:5604013 pps
  (instant variation TX 0.001 ns (min:-0.114 max:0.104) RX 0.000 ns)
 * instant rx:1 tx:5603388 pps n:87 average: rx:1 tx:5603872 pps
  (instant variation TX -0.015 ns (min:-0.031 max:0.060) RX 0.000 ns)
 * instant rx:1 tx:5604332 pps n:429 average: rx:1 tx:5603300 pps
  (instant variation TX 0.033 ns (min:-0.094 max:0.881) RX 0.000 ns)
 * Average: (5604013+5603872+5603300)/3 = 5603728

Compared to baseline: (averaged 5609929 pps)
 * (1/5609929*10^9)-(1/5603728*10^9) = -0.197ns

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-27 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-25 23:34 [PATCH 0/2] Get rid of ndo_xmit_flush David Miller
2014-08-26  6:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-26 10:13   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-26 12:52     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-26 16:43       ` Alexander Duyck
2014-08-27  7:48         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-27  8:37           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-26 14:40     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-09-01  0:37     ` Rusty Russell
2014-08-27 12:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2014-08-27 20:43   ` David Miller
2014-08-27 12:31 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-08-27 13:23   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-27 13:56     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-08-27 14:09       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-27 20:48       ` David Miller
2014-08-27 20:46     ` David Miller
2014-08-27 20:45   ` David Miller
2014-08-28  1:42     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-08-30  3:22       ` David Miller
2014-08-30 10:23         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-01 20:05         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-01 21:56           ` David Miller
2014-09-01 22:31             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-01 22:35               ` David Miller
2014-08-27 18:28 ` Cong Wang
2014-08-27 19:31   ` Tom Herbert
2014-08-27 20:53     ` David Miller
2014-08-27 20:51   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140827141918.198cba38@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.