Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] sheepdog: fix a core dump while do auto-reconnecting

["Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>]

The Thursday 28 Aug 2014 à 18:27:55 (+0800), Liu Yuan wrote :
> We should reinit local_err as NULL inside the while loop or g_free() will report
> corrupption and abort the QEMU when sheepdog driver tries reconnecting.
> 
> This was broken in commit 356b4ca.
> 
> qemu-system-x86_64: failed to get the header, Resource temporarily unavailable
> qemu-system-x86_64: Failed to connect to socket: Connection refused
> qemu-system-x86_64: (null)
> [xcb] Unknown sequence number while awaiting reply
> [xcb] Most likely this is a multi-threaded client and XInitThreads has not been called
> [xcb] Aborting, sorry about that.
> qemu-system-x86_64: ../../src/xcb_io.c:298: poll_for_response: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yuan <namei.unix@gmail.com>
> ---
>  block/sheepdog.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> index 12cbd9d..53c24d6 100644
> --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> @@ -712,7 +712,6 @@ static void coroutine_fn send_pending_req(BDRVSheepdogState *s, uint64_t oid)
>  
>  static coroutine_fn void reconnect_to_sdog(void *opaque)
>  {
> -    Error *local_err = NULL;
>      BDRVSheepdogState *s = opaque;
>      AIOReq *aio_req, *next;
>  
> @@ -727,6 +726,7 @@ static coroutine_fn void reconnect_to_sdog(void *opaque)
>  
>      /* Try to reconnect the sheepdog server every one second. */
>      while (s->fd < 0) {
> +        Error *local_err = NULL;
>          s->fd = get_sheep_fd(s, &local_err);
>          if (s->fd < 0) {
>              DPRINTF("Wait for connection to be established\n");
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 

I am not a sheepdog expert but from the code it looks good.

Reviewed-by: Benoît Canet <benoit.canet@nodalink.com>