From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>,
Martin von Gagern <Martin.vGagern@gmx.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] resolved deltas
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:15:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140828221518.GA18799@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140828220821.GA31545@peff.net>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:08:21PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> So we need some kind of mutual exclusion so that only one thread
> proceeds with resolving the delta. The "real_type" check sort-of
> functions in that way (except of course it is not actually thread safe).
Here's a patch which implements that. Since I couldn't replicate the
original problem with helgrind, I am just guessing at whether it
properly fixes it (well, it is more than just a guess; I used my brain
to analyze it, but that is far from foolproof).
It uses a single lock. I did a best-of-five timing of "git index-pack
--verify" on the kernel repo, both before and after. The results ended
up quite similar (both about 57s), though the run-to-run numbers are all
over the place (up to about 65s in the worst case). So maybe it is not
so bad.
As I implemented, I realized that even with the mutex, I really was just
implementing compare_and_swap (and I wrote it that way to make it more
obvious). So if we wanted to, it would be trivial to replace the
"claim_delta" function with a true compare-and-swap instruction if the
compiler and processor support it.
---
diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c
index f7dc5b0..ed9e253 100644
--- a/builtin/index-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/index-pack.c
@@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ static pthread_mutex_t deepest_delta_mutex;
#define deepest_delta_lock() lock_mutex(&deepest_delta_mutex)
#define deepest_delta_unlock() unlock_mutex(&deepest_delta_mutex)
+static pthread_mutex_t object_entry_mutex;
+#define object_entry_lock() lock_mutex(&object_entry_mutex)
+#define object_entry_unlock() unlock_mutex(&object_entry_mutex)
+
static pthread_key_t key;
static inline void lock_mutex(pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
@@ -135,6 +139,7 @@ static void init_thread(void)
init_recursive_mutex(&read_mutex);
pthread_mutex_init(&counter_mutex, NULL);
pthread_mutex_init(&work_mutex, NULL);
+ pthread_mutex_init(&object_entry_mutex, NULL);
if (show_stat)
pthread_mutex_init(&deepest_delta_mutex, NULL);
pthread_key_create(&key, NULL);
@@ -157,6 +162,7 @@ static void cleanup_thread(void)
pthread_mutex_destroy(&read_mutex);
pthread_mutex_destroy(&counter_mutex);
pthread_mutex_destroy(&work_mutex);
+ pthread_mutex_destroy(&object_entry_mutex);
if (show_stat)
pthread_mutex_destroy(&deepest_delta_mutex);
for (i = 0; i < nr_threads; i++)
@@ -862,7 +868,6 @@ static void resolve_delta(struct object_entry *delta_obj,
{
void *base_data, *delta_data;
- delta_obj->real_type = base->obj->real_type;
if (show_stat) {
delta_obj->delta_depth = base->obj->delta_depth + 1;
deepest_delta_lock();
@@ -888,6 +893,21 @@ static void resolve_delta(struct object_entry *delta_obj,
counter_unlock();
}
+static int claim_delta(struct object_entry *delta_obj,
+ enum object_type delta_type,
+ enum object_type base_type)
+{
+ enum object_type old_type;
+
+ object_entry_lock();
+ old_type = delta_obj->real_type;
+ if (old_type == delta_type)
+ delta_obj->real_type = base_type;
+ object_entry_unlock();
+
+ return old_type == delta_type;
+}
+
static struct base_data *find_unresolved_deltas_1(struct base_data *base,
struct base_data *prev_base)
{
@@ -914,7 +934,7 @@ static struct base_data *find_unresolved_deltas_1(struct base_data *base,
if (base->ref_first <= base->ref_last) {
struct object_entry *child = objects + deltas[base->ref_first].obj_no;
- if (child->real_type == OBJ_REF_DELTA) {
+ if (claim_delta(child, OBJ_REF_DELTA, base->obj->real_type)) {
struct base_data *result = alloc_base_data();
resolve_delta(child, base, result);
@@ -930,7 +950,7 @@ static struct base_data *find_unresolved_deltas_1(struct base_data *base,
if (base->ofs_first <= base->ofs_last) {
struct object_entry *child = objects + deltas[base->ofs_first].obj_no;
- if (child->real_type == OBJ_OFS_DELTA) {
+ if (claim_delta(child, OBJ_OFS_DELTA, base->obj->real_type)) {
struct base_data *result = alloc_base_data();
resolve_delta(child, base, result);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 11:35 [BUG] resolved deltas Petr Stodulka
2014-08-21 18:25 ` Petr Stodulka
2014-08-22 19:41 ` Martin von Gagern
2014-08-23 10:12 ` René Scharfe
2014-08-23 10:56 ` Jeff King
2014-08-23 11:04 ` Jeff King
2014-08-23 11:18 ` Jeff King
2014-08-25 16:39 ` René Scharfe
2014-08-28 22:08 ` Jeff King
2014-08-28 22:15 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-08-28 23:04 ` Jeff King
2014-08-28 22:22 ` Jeff King
2014-08-28 23:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-29 20:55 ` Jeff King
2014-08-29 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] index-pack: fix race condition with duplicate bases Jeff King
2014-08-29 20:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] index-pack: handle duplicate base objects gracefully Jeff King
2014-08-29 21:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-29 22:08 ` Jeff King
2014-08-30 2:59 ` Shawn Pearce
2014-08-30 13:16 ` Jeff King
2014-08-30 16:00 ` René Scharfe
2014-08-31 15:17 ` Jeff King
2014-08-31 16:30 ` René Scharfe
2014-08-31 1:10 ` Shawn Pearce
2014-08-31 15:24 ` Jeff King
2014-08-31 22:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-30 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/2] t5309: mark delta-cycle failover tests as passing Jeff King
2014-08-31 15:15 ` Jeff King
2014-09-02 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-25 17:19 ` [BUG] resolved deltas Shawn Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140828221518.GA18799@peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Martin.vGagern@gmx.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.