From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: kill xfs_bioerror_relse
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:05:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140830000547.GG20518@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140829182610.GA28670@infradead.org>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:26:10AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:12:36AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > This is a large change of behavior as it doesn't hit the error
> > > path after the xfs_buf_iowait anymore. While I don't think that
> > > that path was entirely correct this version seems to be even less so
> > > by not releasing the buffer reference or forcing the shutdown.
> >
> > The IO is synchronous, so the previous behaviour did not release
> > the buffer here. But, yes, it needs to because we're not running the
> > io wait on it anymore. And this happens only during a shutdown, so i
> > don't see any need to trigger a shutdown ;)
> >
> > As it is, I think this gets properly fixed by the next patch....
>
> Do you have any scenario that might actually exercise this path? I
> enabled xfs_trans_read_buf_io trace events and run xfstests as well
> as a few other workloads and couldn't hit it at all. And when you
> think of it: when would be do a trans_get_buf, then not actually
> updating it with data and then recurse into a trans_read_buf in
> the same transaction?
*nod*. This path has been there is the Irix days, and I suspect that
it was there to handle some wierd corner case to do with async
buffer reads which IIRC, could once be done through this code...
> Maybe it's just time do a bit more of an audit and put this whole
> code path to rest.
Perhaps so.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-30 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-15 6:38 [RFC PATCH 0/9] xfs: clean up xfs_buf io interfaces Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 6:38 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: synchronous buffer IO needs a reference Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 13:18 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-15 23:17 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-18 14:15 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-29 0:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-15 6:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: xfs_buf_ioend and xfs_buf_iodone_work duplicate functionality Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 13:18 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-15 23:21 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-18 14:15 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-29 0:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-29 0:55 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 6:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: rework xfs_buf_bio_endio error handling Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 13:18 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-15 23:25 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-15 6:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: kill xfs_bdstrat_cb Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-15 6:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: xfs_bioerror can die Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 14:35 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-15 23:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-29 1:05 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 6:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: kill xfs_bioerror_relse Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-29 1:12 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 18:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-30 0:05 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-08-15 6:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: clean up xfs_trans_buf_read_map Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 6:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: introduce xfs_buf_submit[_wait] Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-15 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-16 4:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-15 14:35 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-15 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-18 14:16 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-15 16:13 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-15 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-18 14:26 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-15 6:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: check xfs_buf_read_uncached returns correctly Dave Chinner
2014-08-15 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-15 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140830000547.GG20518@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.