All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reachable.c: add HEAD to reachability starting commits
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:28:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140831152806.GC17449@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409432315-20803-1-git-send-email-max@max630.net>

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:58:35PM +0300, Max Kirillov wrote:

> HEAD is not explicitly used as a starting commit for
> calculating reachability, so if it's detached and reflogs
> are disabled it may be pruned.

Eek, you're right. I think nobody noticed because the HEAD reflog
usually picks it up (and you do not usually detach HEAD on a bare repo).
But I agree we should include it to cover this case.

> diff --git a/reachable.c b/reachable.c
> index 654a8c5..6f6835b 100644
> --- a/reachable.c
> +++ b/reachable.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ void mark_reachable_objects(struct rev_info *revs, int mark_reflog,
>  	/* Add all external refs */
>  	for_each_ref(add_one_ref, revs);
>  
> +	/* detached HEAD is not included in the list above */
> +	head_ref(add_one_ref, revs);
> +
>  	/* Add all reflog info */
>  	if (mark_reflog)
>  		for_each_reflog(add_one_reflog, revs);

Looks obviously correct.

> diff --git a/t/t5312-prune-detached.sh b/t/t5312-prune-detached.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..fac93e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t5312-prune-detached.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +test_description='no prune detached head without reflog'
> +. ./test-lib.sh
> +
> +test_expect_success 'make repo' '
> +	git config core.logAllRefUpdates false
> +	git commit --allow-empty -m commit1 &&
> +	git commit --allow-empty -m commit2 &&
> +	git checkout  --detach master &&
> +	git commit --allow-empty -m commit3
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'prune does not delete anything' '
> +	git prune -n >prune_actual &&
> +	: >prune_expected &&
> +	test_cmp prune_expected prune_actual'
> +
> +test_done

Your test looks reasonable, but is there any reason it cannot go in
t5304 with the other prune tests?

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-31 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-30 20:58 [PATCH] reachable.c: add HEAD to reachability starting commits Max Kirillov
2014-08-31 15:28 ` Jeff King [this message]
2014-08-31 21:16   ` [PATCH v2] " Max Kirillov
2014-09-02 17:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-03 16:14       ` [PATCH v3] " Max Kirillov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140831152806.GC17449@peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=max@max630.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.