From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935763AbaICXWL (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:22:11 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:48990 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934455AbaICXWF (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:22:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 00:21:49 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Peter Foley Cc: Randy Dunlap , LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg Message-ID: <20140903232149.GG29327@sirena.org.uk> References: <1397743910-18391-1-git-send-email-pefoley2@pefoley.com> <53FB9DA0.7000301@infradead.org> <540651B3.8030400@infradead.org> <20140902232906.GG29327@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VvwS7Fyc3fvERiQe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Simulated picture. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: use subdir-y to avoid unnecessary built-in.o files X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --VvwS7Fyc3fvERiQe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:08:38PM -0400, Peter Foley wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Your tree either wasn't in the control file that Stephen handed off or > > got eaten by one off his scripts for some reason. I've tried adding it > > back, we'll see if that works tomorrow. > The patches still seem to be missing from the 20140903 -next tree, > unfortunately. The update is not happening because: | git am ../quilt/rd-docs/001-docum-use-subdiry-avoid-builtin.patch | Patch format detection failed. I guess either something changed in the way Randy is generating his patches or I'm using a different version of git which doesn't like them - looking at te patch files I'm not *entirely* surprised they=20 have trouble. --VvwS7Fyc3fvERiQe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUB6KKAAoJELSic+t+oim9HrEP/j1hv0BAmWSvGOEx8t6JWZpE OCpqH1DCllz/y2k6h2BZJwdfGKDCWc5NnVVmSE8dLPVXHsqaNMA8OjSod8uarJ6S pM+PGaYaK9X5SlTeEaqew793iNKl4n6vj+KyxVobDqnmVEguIGd4vQxZ4n9QjFqW L1K9B7IUwyIaLZ0ayE9cPBxSTX7IbyXN0YcHNVxKu/FAJZt8U3Ns9y6I/WPAqV0P wDtr3TCIDrWwt9CfC+/rqlmlKAQ6iPuqo8sPn+kiaOg9dbTf6iibLPIEhDod96Am lwtKQELP6rGhPoRuHjxa4mEGTERu47aWHTv6WYUIiTR0he/b5DLQ3QdccNfFsrR+ HoytfYQDT79j3bG/GVOJOAXxWaMXnJn6QQuPsfiJVkAejIxqYZZpRCrkaYI3RaXK WTd3QbFp8oqDf/+gDmRCzd98jd/ne9iLQFyyKwsJhvANHetAFPZNSKydUm28gQ/+ fycjkTxf26MwMOSzIqyZakMsyzrjHTQ7mK1Mvar0kOIJxFYtSMrNNe8VLoXARIvB ZuNjfi8F6wM94LqsopVwbKTHJlfgPWOJHPlTJib+25fXUbN6btXvYsqrLT/BdM4d zyDLfAmR2LuTlar5Xf+pml7KAVQadt5R/UR/fTFiR6yKj1TjVz8S17xV12Kf6l0m OVKnHepSUXYKAmDHKuCp =w5+c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VvwS7Fyc3fvERiQe--