On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:25:23PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:07 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> 
> > So in the meantime the attached patch should work, it just silently ignore
> > the caching attribute request on non x86 instead of pretending that things
> > are setup as expected and then latter the radeon ou nouveau hw unsetting
> > the snoop bit.
> > 
> > It's not tested but i think it should work.
> 
> I'm still getting placements with !CACHED going from bo_memcpy in
> ttm_io_prot() though ... I'm looking at filtering the placement
> attributes instead.
> 
> Ben.

Ok so this one should do the trick.


> 
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jérôme
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Ben.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 
>