From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sylvain BERTRAND <sylware@legeek.net>
Subject: SI display gap for more than 2 displays
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:52:20 +0200
Message-ID: <20140904135123.GA231@freedom>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from bounce-vit-1.online.net (bounce-vit-1.online.net
 [88.190.253.79])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC1A6E640
 for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; Thu,  4 Sep 2014 07:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [88.190.253.76] (helo=smtpauth-vit.online.net)
 by bounce-vit-1.online.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <sylware@legeek.net>) id 1XPXSb-0007ri-A7
 for dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:52:25 +0200
Received: from [88.188.175.165] (helo=localhost)
 by smtpauth-vit.online.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <sylware@legeek.net>) id 1XPXSV-0007MQ-VH
 for dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:52:20 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
 <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
 <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel" <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Hi,

In si_program_display_gap we have DISP1_GAP and DISP2_GAP.

Where are DISP3_GAP to DISP6_GAP? What does expect this hardware
block when more than 2 displays are connected? Is DISP2_GAP
actually stand for DISP[3-6]_GAP?

Still in the same function, what happened to the pipes for
DCCG_DISP[2-6]_SLOW_SELECT?

regards,

-- 
Sylvain

P.S. It seems that all this was "fixed" in CI with new hardware
blocks, but I'm focussing on SI blocks.