From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] perf record: Filter out POLLHUP'ed file descriptors
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:19:02 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140904151902.GE2997@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54085BC8.40403@intel.com>
Em Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:32:08PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 09/04/2014 12:59 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > So that we don't continue polling on vanished file descriptors, i.e.
> > file descriptors for events monitoring threads that exited.
> > I.e. the following 'perf record' command now exits as expected, instead
> > of staying in an eternal loop:
> > $ sleep 5s &
> > $ perf record -p `pidof sleep`
> > Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
<SNIP>
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > @@ -467,6 +467,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
> > if (err > 0 || (err < 0 && errno == EINTR))
> > err = 0;
> > waking++;
> > + if (perf_evlist__filter_pollfd(rec->evlist, POLLERR | POLLHUP) == 0)
>
> If the poll fds only include the ones mmapped, then mightn't it filter out
> ones still in use? e.g. what if you record two processes and one exits?
Humm, without looking at the code, we would be needlessly looking at the
mmaps for the threads that exited.
I.e. we need to associate at the fdarray level the mmaps for the
descriptors, so that we can, at fdarray__filter() time, munmap the
POLLHUPed descriptors, right?
I'll take a look at the code to see what is needed.
But then this makes the patch set good for a class of problems while
maintaining existing behaviour for the case you outlined, i.e. this is a
partial fix and should go now, with further patches on top of it?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-04 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-03 21:59 [RFC 00/10] perf pollfd series v2 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 21:59 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf evlist: Introduce perf_evlist__filter_pollfd method Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 21:59 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf tests: Add test for perf_evlist__filter_pollfd() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 21:59 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf evlist: Monitor POLLERR and POLLHUP events too Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 21:59 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf record: Filter out POLLHUP'ed file descriptors Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-04 12:32 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-09-04 15:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2014-09-05 8:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2014-09-05 14:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-06 20:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-09-08 13:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-08 14:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-09-08 14:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-08 15:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-09-08 15:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-08 17:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-26 9:21 ` [tip:perf/core] perf evlist: Refcount mmaps tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-26 9:20 ` [tip:perf/core] perf evlist: We need to poll all event file descriptors tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 21:59 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf trace: Filter out POLLHUP'ed " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 22:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf evlist: Allow growing pollfd on add method Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 22:00 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf tests: Add pollfd growing test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 22:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf kvm stat live: Use perf_evlist__add_pollfd() instead of local equivalent Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 22:00 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf evlist: Introduce poll method for common code idiom Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-09-03 22:00 ` [PATCH 10/10] tools lib api: Adopt fdarray class from perf's evlist Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-22 20:59 [RFC 00/10] perf pollfd series Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-08-22 20:59 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf record: Filter out POLLHUP'ed file descriptors Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140904151902.GE2997@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.